01Facts
The petitioner sought a direction for an independent inquiry into her sexual-harassment complaint dated 20 September 2021 against the seventh respondent.
p. 2The third respondent stated that the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), constituted under Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, had inquired into the complaint, recommended disciplinary action, and that proceedings under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, resulted in a penalty of censure against the seventh respondent.
pp. 2–4The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the inquiry report had not been furnished; the third respondent undertook to provide it.
p. 402Issues
i.1. Whether, in light of the ICC inquiry and subsequent disciplinary proceedings, any relief remained to be granted on the petitioner’s request for an independent inquiry.
pp. 2, 4–5ii.2. Whether the petitioner should be provided with a copy of the inquiry report under Section 13(1) of the POSH Act.
pp. 4–503Law Applied
Section 4 of the POSH Act provides for constitution of an Internal Complaints Committee to inquire into workplace sexual-harassment complaints; Section 13(1) concerns the inquiry report.
p. 3, 5Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, was invoked for the disciplinary proceedings following the ICC’s recommendation.
p. 3Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 Section 4Section 13
04Reasoning
The Court noted that the ICC had already examined the complaint, its recommendation had led to disciplinary proceedings, and the seventh respondent had received a penalty of censure. In view of those subsequent developments, the Court concluded that nothing further remained to be decided on the request for an independent inquiry.
p. 4However, because the petitioner had not received the inquiry report and the third respondent undertook to supply it, the Court directed that it be furnished.
pp. 4–505Holding
The Court closed the writ petition as no further relief was required in light of the inquiry and disciplinary action already taken.
pp. 4–5It directed the third respondent to serve the petitioner with the inquiry report contemplated under Section 13(1) of the POSH Act within two weeks of receiving the order, and left the petitioner at liberty to pursue any legal remedies concerning the report.
p. 5No costs were ordered; the connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.
p. 5Original Court PDF
R.GomathyvsUnion of India
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
