Chhattisgarh High CourtProperty and Real Estate LawAdministrative and Public Law

After 2023 Demarcation Order Remained Uncompleted, Chhattisgarh HC Fixes Nov 17, 2026 Date For Durg Land Demarcation

D AND D CONSTRUCTIONS,v.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

After 2023 Demarcation Order Remained Uncompleted, Chhattisgarh HC Fixes Nov 17, 2026 Date For Durg Land Demarcation. D AND D CONSTRUCTIONS, vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Court should direct completion of the pending demarcation proceedings, and on what timetable.

The court held

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner and the concerned authorities to carry out demarcation on 17 November 2026, strictly in accordance with law.

It also directed

The authorities were to issue requisite notices during the week commencing 2 November 2026; no separate notice to the petitioner was required. Persons duly served were directed to attend and cooperate, and the authorities were to ensure fair and transparent proceedings.

01Facts

The petitioner sought demarcation of land bearing Khasra Nos. 18/7 and 18/38 at Village Titurdih, District Durg. Although the Additional Collector, Durg, had directed demarcation by order dated 7 February 2023, the proceedings had not been completed.

¶ 1

The State submitted that arrangements for demarcation had been made, but that the petitioner had sought time, delaying the process.

¶ 3

The petitioner undertook to cooperate with the authorities.

¶ 4

The petitioner also sought protection against interference with possession and construction, and challenged the respondents’ alleged inaction as unconstitutional.

¶ 2

02Issues

i.Whether the Court should direct completion of the pending demarcation proceedings, and on what timetable.

¶ 1, 6

ii.Whether the demarcation should proceed with notice and participation by the concerned persons, and without requiring a separate notice to the petitioner.

¶ 6–8

03Law Applied

The Court did not cite any specific statute, precedent, or constitutional doctrine as the basis for its decision.

¶ 1–9

It directed that demarcation be conducted strictly in accordance with law and that the proceedings be fair and transparent; persons duly served with notice must have an opportunity to participate.

¶ 6, 8

04Reasoning

The Court considered the Additional Collector’s existing demarcation order, the State’s submission that arrangements were ready, and the petitioner’s undertaking to cooperate.

¶ 1, 3–5

To bring the matter to a conclusion while ensuring procedural fairness, it fixed a date for demarcation and required advance notices to the other concerned persons. It dispensed with separate notice to the petitioner and directed duly served persons to attend and participate.

¶ 6–8

The Court did not separately determine the petitioner’s claims for protection of possession or construction, or its constitutional challenge.

¶ 2, 9

05Holding

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner and the concerned authorities to carry out demarcation on 17 November 2026, strictly in accordance with law.

¶ 6–9

The authorities were to issue requisite notices during the week commencing 2 November 2026; no separate notice to the petitioner was required. Persons duly served were directed to attend and cooperate, and the authorities were to ensure fair and transparent proceedings.

¶ 6–9
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

D AND D CONSTRUCTIONS,vsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment