01Facts
The petitioner claimed ownership of land bearing Khasra No. 375/2, measuring 0.19 hectares, and applied under Section 250 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code for relief concerning the land.
¶ 2The Tehsildar dismissed the application, finding that private respondents had been in possession for 30–35 years; the petitioner’s appeals and revision were also dismissed, with the Board of Revenue concluding that the application had not been filed within two years of dispossession.
¶ 2 · ¶ 3The petitioner challenged the Board’s order and sought, among other relief, removal of the alleged encroachment.
¶ 1Respondent No. 5 informed the Court that the petitioner had filed a civil suit for declaration of title and possession on 12 September 2023.
¶ 1, 402Issues
i.1. Whether the Court should interfere with the Board of Revenue’s order where the petitioner had already instituted a civil suit for declaration of title and possession.
¶ 3–6ii.2. Whether the petitioner should pursue the dispute over title and possession before the civil court.
¶ 4–703Law Applied
Section 250 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code was the statutory basis for the petitioner’s application before the Tehsildar.
¶ 2The petitioner could pursue the pending civil suit, and the observations of the revenue courts and the High Court would not bind the civil court, which must decide the matter independently on its merits and in accordance with law.
¶ 7Provisions in the judgment · 1
C.G. Land Revenue Code Section 250
04Reasoning
The Court noted that the petitioner’s challenge concerned the revenue proceedings and the Board’s dismissal of his revision, but that a civil suit for declaration of title and possession was already pending.
¶ 3–5In view of that suit, the Court considered the civil court the appropriate forum for the petitioner to pursue his remedies and found no basis to interfere with the impugned order.
¶ 6It left the civil court free to determine the dispute independently.
¶ 705Holding
The Court dismissed the writ petition and did not interfere with the Board of Revenue’s order.
¶ 7The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the pending civil suit for declaration of title and possession; the civil court was directed to decide the matter on its own merits, uninfluenced by observations made in the revenue proceedings or in the High Court’s order.
¶ 7Original Court PDF
YOGESH KUMAR SAHUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
