01Facts
On 28 March 2021, following a dispute over money, Akash Chouhan allegedly stabbed Sheikh Shabbir in the abdomen with a knife.
¶ 1–5The trial court convicted Chouhan under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 25(1B)(b) and 27(1) of the Arms Act, sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment and fines.
¶ 1–5On appeal under Section 415(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the appellant did not challenge his convictions and sought reduction of his sentence to the period already served.
¶ 602Issues
i.1. Whether the trial court’s convictions under Section 307 IPC and Sections 25(1B)(b) and 27(1) of the Arms Act should be affirmed
¶ 6, 9ii.2. Whether the appellant’s custodial sentence should be reduced to the period already undergone
¶ 6–7, 1003Law Applied
Section 307 IPC concerns an attempt to murder; Sections 25(1B)(b) and 27(1) of the Arms Act provide for offences and punishment relating to unlawful possession and use of firearms or other arms as applicable.
¶ 1The appeal was brought under Section 415(2) BNSS.
¶ 1In considering post-conviction release, the Court also referred to Section 481 BNSS, directing the appellant to furnish a bond in Form No. 45 for six months.
¶ 13The judgment cites no precedent or separate sentencing test; it assesses the sentence in light of the injury, the circumstances of the case, and the period already served.
¶ 10Provisions in the judgment · 8 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415Section 481
Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 307Section 294Section 34Section 506
Arms Act, 1959 Section 25Section 27
04Reasoning
The Court found that the injured witness’s testimony, the medical evidence, and the seizure of the knife supported the finding that the appellant stabbed the victim in the abdomen.
¶ 9It therefore declined to disturb the convictions, which the appellant had not pressed in the appeal.
¶ 9On sentence, the Court considered the isolated injury, the case circumstances, and the appellant’s more than five years and six months in custody.
¶ 10It concluded that further detention would serve no useful purpose and that the ends of justice would be met by reducing the custodial terms to the period already undergone.
¶ 1005Holding
The appeal was partly allowed.
¶ 11–13The convictions under Section 307 IPC and Sections 25(1B)(b) and 27(1) of the Arms Act were affirmed, but the custodial sentences were reduced to the period already undergone.
¶ 11–13The fines and default sentences remained intact.
¶ 11–13The Court directed the appellant’s release forthwith unless required in another case and ordered him to furnish the specified bond under Section 481 BNSS.
¶ 11–13Original Court PDF
AKASH CHOUHANvsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
