01Facts
The petitioners, employees of the State Resource Centre for Adult and Continuing Education, initially sought permanent absorption into an equivalent Government post. By the time the matter was heard, they had superannuated, and the question of absorption no longer arose.
p. 4They instead pursued salary arrears, claiming that salaries had not been paid from November 2019 after Central Government funding ceased.
p. 4The State acknowledged salary dues and the Centre’s available funds, but raised the limitation in its bylaws that no more than 25% of funds generated in a year could be used for staff welfare.
pp. 4–8The State also stated that the Tamil Nadu Board of Continuing Education, under which the Centre was established, had been dissolved under Section 44(4) of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975.
pp. 4–802Issues
i.1. Whether the petitioners’ unpaid salary arrears could be disbursed from the funds available to the State Resource Centre, notwithstanding the dissolution of the society under which it was established.
pp. 8–10ii.2. Whether the petitioners’ claim for salary arrears constituted a continuing liability enforceable under the proviso to Section 44(4) of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975.
pp. 9–1003Law Applied
Section 44(4) of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 provides for a registered society to be deemed dissolved upon publication of the prescribed notice.
p. 9Its proviso preserves the liability, if any, of every officer and member of the society, which may be enforced as if the society had not been dissolved.
p. 9The Court applied this proviso to the employees’ salary claim, treating it as a liability that survived dissolution.
p. 10Provisions in the judgment · 1
Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 Section 44
04Reasoning
The Court noted that the petitioners’ claim for salary from November 2019 was not seriously disputed, and that the State had disclosed the Centre’s bank balances and fixed deposits.
pp. 7–8Although the State raised the bylaw restriction limiting the use of funds for staff welfare, the Court focused on the statutory proviso preserving liabilities after dissolution.
pp. 8–10It held that the salary claim fell within that proviso and directed the State respondents to exercise their powers under Section 44(4) to enforce the liability and disburse the arrears.
pp. 8–1005Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition, directing respondents 3 to 5 to disburse the salary arrears to all employees on a pro rata basis within twelve weeks of receiving the order.
p. 10It did not grant the original absorption relief, as the petitioners had superannuated.
p. 4No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
p. 10Original Court PDF
V.Anbu PiriyavathanivsThe Secretary to Union Government
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
