Karnataka High Court
Employment and Labour LawConstitutional Law

An unexplained eight-year delay and perverse findings warrant setting aside an industrial award.

THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs SRI. R. NAGARAJU

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
An unexplained eight-year delay and perverse findings warrant setting aside an industrial award.. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION vs SRI. R. NAGARAJU. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The workman, a KSRTC conductor, was charged with failing to issue tickets to two passengers after collecting the fare.

Source reference: p. 2

Following a domestic enquiry, the disciplinary authority permanently reduced his basic pay by two annual incremental stages and treated his suspension period as not being on duty.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

The workman claimed to have appealed, but produced no proof of the appeal. He sought a reference in 2011, eight years after the penalty order of 20 September 2003.

Source reference: pp. 3, 6–7

The Tribunal allowed the reference by an award dated 25 October 2019. KSRTC challenged that award under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in allowing the reference despite the workman’s unexplained eight-year delay in challenging the penalty order

Source reference: pp. 4, 6–7

Whether the Tribunal’s finding in the workman’s favour was sustainable in light of the evidence that two passengers were travelling without tickets

Source reference: pp. 4–5, 7–8
03

Law Applied

The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution to review the Tribunal’s award.

Source reference: p. 2

It applied the principles that an unexplained delay in seeking a reference may warrant rejection of the claim, and that a Tribunal’s finding unsupported by the record or contrary to the evidence may be set aside as perverse.

Source reference: pp. 7–8

The judgment cites no specific statute governing the reference or precedents.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The workman did not establish that he had filed an appeal or explain the eight-year interval before seeking a reference; the Tribunal had condoned the delay without giving reasons.

Source reference: p. 7

On the merits, the passengers were found without tickets, had paid a penalty, and had given statements confirming that they were travelling ticketless. The workman offered no material to disprove this evidence; his account that the passengers had boarded shortly before the stop to reserve seats was unsupported.

Source reference: pp. 7–8

The Court therefore held that the Tribunal had accepted that explanation without supporting material, rendering its finding perverse and contrary to the record.

Source reference: p. 8
05

Holding

The Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the Tribunal’s award dated 25 October 2019 in I.D. No. 260/2011.
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONvsSRI. R. NAGARAJU

Karnataka High Court · October 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment