Facts
Chetna Singh, the applicant’s sister and daughter of co-accused Tikatin Bai alias Pushpa, filed a complaint under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Following an inquiry, the Magistrate directed the police to register a case, and Crime No. 0649/2026 was registered at Kotwali Police Station, Korba, for offences under Sections 463, 464, 467, 470, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.
Source reference: para. 2Kuldeep Singh sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, claiming innocence, no criminal antecedents, and parity with his mother, who had already been granted anticipatory bail in MCRCA No. 1486/2026.
Source reference: paras. 1, 3The State opposed the application but did not dispute that the allegations against the applicant were identical to those against his mother.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
1. Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0649/2026
Source reference: paras. 1, 62. Whether the grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant’s co-accused mother, together with the absence of criminal antecedents, supported granting him relief on parity
Source reference: paras. 3–6Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides the basis for seeking anticipatory bail.
Source reference: para. 1The Court considered the circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, parity with a co-accused who had been granted anticipatory bail, and the applicant’s lack of criminal antecedents in deciding whether to grant relief.
Source reference: para. 6The alleged offences were under Sections 463, 464, 467, 470, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.
Source reference: para. 1The order cites no precedent or further substantive test for anticipatory bail.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court considered the applicant’s relationship to the co-accused, the prior grant of anticipatory bail to his mother, the absence of criminal antecedents, and the State’s confirmation that the allegations against the two were identical.
Source reference: paras. 3–5On those circumstances, and without expressing any view on the merits, the Court found the applicant’s case fit for anticipatory bail.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed that, in the event of arrest in Crime No. 0649/2026, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount.
The applicant must cooperate with interrogation, refrain from influencing persons acquainted with the case, avoid conduct prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial, and appear before the trial Court on each date fixed until disposal of the trial.
Source reference: para. 7(i)–(iv)Acts & Sections Cited
7 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20232
Indian Penal Code, 18605
Original Court PDF
KULDEEP SINGHvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
