Karnataka High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Bail may be granted after charge-sheet filing when custodial interrogation is unnecessary and risks can be addressed by conditions.

SHANKAR @ SHANKAR RAOv.THE STATE THROUGH

Bail may be granted after charge-sheet filing when custodial interrogation is unnecessary and risks can be addressed by conditions.. SHANKAR @ SHANKAR RAO vs THE STATE THROUGH. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 483 BNSS notwithstanding the seriousness of the offence alleged under Section 64 BNS.

The court held

The Court allowed the petition and ordered the petitioner’s release on bail in Crime No. 110/2026 upon executing a personal bond of ₹2,00,000 with two sureties for the like sum.

It also directed

Bail was subject to conditions requiring him to cooperate with the Investigating Officer, appear before the Magistrate and trial court as directed, refrain from tampering with witnesses or hampering the investigation, and commit no similar or other offence during the pendency of the case. Breach of any condition would result in cancellation of bail.

01Facts

The petitioner, the sole accused, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”), in Crime No. 110/2026, registered for an offence under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS”).

pp. 2–4 · ¶ 2, 4

The allegation was that on 10 May 2026, he forcibly took the 65-year-old complainant into his house and sexually assaulted her.

pp. 2–4 · ¶ 2, 4

The investigation was complete and the charge sheet had been filed. The State opposed bail, relying on the seriousness of the charge and the material collected, including the victim’s medical report.

pp. 3, 5–6 · ¶ 3, 5, 8

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 483 BNSS notwithstanding the seriousness of the offence alleged under Section 64 BNS.

pp. 5–7 · ¶ 7–10

ii.2. Whether the completion of the investigation, the petitioner’s local residence, and the absence of material showing prior offences supported release on bail subject to conditions.

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8–10

03Law Applied

Section 483 BNSS empowers the High Court or Court of Session to grant bail.

pp. 5–7 · ¶ 7–10

The Court treated the nature and punishment of the alleged offence, the need for further custodial interrogation, the accused’s roots in the jurisdiction, any indication of antecedents, and the possibility of addressing prosecution concerns through conditions as relevant considerations in deciding bail.

pp. 5–7 · ¶ 7–10

The Court noted that Section 64 BNS, as applicable to the charge alleged, carried a term of imprisonment of not less than ten years, extendable to twenty years, but was not punishable with death or imprisonment for life.

p. 5 · ¶ 7

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 439

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64

04Reasoning

The Court considered the alleged offence serious and declined to determine the petitioner’s innocence or resolve discrepancies between witness statements at the bail stage.

pp. 4–5 · ¶ 5–6

However, it reasoned that the charge-sheet had been filed and custodial interrogation was no longer required; continued pre-trial detention should not serve as punishment, even where a prima facie case exists.

pp. 5–6 · ¶ 8

The petitioner was a permanent resident within the jurisdiction, and the State had produced no material showing prior similar or other offences. The Court held that the State’s apprehensions could be addressed through appropriate bail conditions.

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 9–10

05Holding

The Court allowed the petition and ordered the petitioner’s release on bail in Crime No. 110/2026 upon executing a personal bond of ₹2,00,000 with two sureties for the like sum.

p. 7 · ¶ 11

Bail was subject to conditions requiring him to cooperate with the Investigating Officer, appear before the Magistrate and trial court as directed, refrain from tampering with witnesses or hampering the investigation, and commit no similar or other offence during the pendency of the case. Breach of any condition would result in cancellation of bail.

pp. 7–8 · ¶ 11
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SHANKAR @ SHANKAR RAOvsTHE STATE THROUGH

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment