01Facts
The applicants, Junior Works Managers working with AVNL and India Optel Limited on a deemed-deputation basis, filed an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
¶ 1They challenged a notification dated 2 September 2026 inserting a proviso below Rule 37(7) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021, as well as orders dated 15 June 2026 and 25 June 2026.
¶ 1They sought consideration for redeployment under Rule 37(7).
¶ 1At the hearing, their counsel sought permission to withdraw the application in light of recent developments, with liberty to pursue any surviving grievances in accordance with law.
¶ 202Issues
i.1. Whether the applicants should be permitted to withdraw the O.A. with liberty to pursue any surviving grievances in accordance with law.
¶ 2ii.2. What order should follow in respect of the associated M.A.
¶ 403Law Applied
The O.A. was instituted under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which provides the procedural basis for an application before the Tribunal.
¶ 1The Tribunal made no determination on the substantive validity of the challenged notification or orders, or on the applicants’ claimed entitlement under Rule 37(7) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021; it disposed of the matter on the applicants’ request to withdraw.
Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 19
04Reasoning
The applicants’ counsel sought withdrawal, citing recent developments, and requested liberty to pursue any surviving grievances in accordance with law.
¶ 2The Tribunal granted that permission and, accordingly, did not examine the merits of the challenges to the notification or the other impugned orders.
¶ 2–405Holding
The Tribunal permitted withdrawal of the O.A. and dismissed it as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
¶ 3The associated M.A. was also disposed of, and there was no order as to costs.
¶ 3–5Original Court PDF
Parul KumarvsDEFENCE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![CAT Lets Seven Junior Works Managers Withdraw Ordnance-Factory Pension Rule Challenge, With Liberty To Raise Surviving Grievances. Parul Kumar vs DEFENCE. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/cat-lets-seven-junior-works-managers-withdraw-ordnance-factory-pension-rule-challenge-with-dbc1f277c9e84cc39a328b527b354fa7.webp)