Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To 20-Year-Old Accused In Assault And Scooty-Snatching Case, Citing No Stolen Property Recovered From Him And Filed Chargesheet

ADARSH TOPPOv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To 20-Year-Old Accused In Assault And Scooty-Snatching Case, Citing No Stolen Property Recovered From Him And Filed Chargesheet. ADARSH TOPPO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in light of the circumstances of the case.

The court held

The Court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant’s release upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

It also directed

Bail was subject to conditions prohibiting interference with witnesses or the fair trial and requiring the applicant to attend every hearing until the trial concludes.

01Facts

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 187/2026, registered for alleged offences under Sections 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 1

The prosecution alleged that the applicant and a co-accused assaulted the complainant and forcibly took a scooty and mobile phone.

¶ 1–2

The applicant submitted that he had been in custody since 28 April 2026, had no criminal antecedents, that no stolen property had been recovered from him, and that the charge-sheet had been filed.

¶ 3

The State opposed bail, relying on the seriousness of the allegations.

¶ 4

02Issues

i.Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in light of the circumstances of the case.

¶ 1, 5–6

03Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, empowers the Court to grant regular bail.

¶ 6

In exercising that power, the Court considered the circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the alleged offence, the period of custody, criminal antecedents, recovery of property, filing of the charge-sheet, and the likely duration of trial.

¶ 6

The alleged offences were under Sections 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 1

No precedent was cited.

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 309Section 3

04Reasoning

The Court acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations but weighed them against the applicant’s custody since 28 April 2026, absence of criminal antecedents, lack of recovery of stolen property from his possession, and the filing of the charge-sheet.

¶ 6

As the trial was likely to take time, the Court found these circumstances sufficient to grant bail without expressing any view on the merits.

¶ 6

05Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant’s release upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

¶ 7

Bail was subject to conditions prohibiting interference with witnesses or the fair trial and requiring the applicant to attend every hearing until the trial concludes.

¶ 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

ADARSH TOPPOvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment