01Facts
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered for alleged offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 111 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
¶ 1The prosecution alleged that the applicant’s bank account received credits of ₹17,85,765 and was used to route proceeds of cyber fraud.
¶ 3His earlier bail application had been rejected on merits.
¶ 2In support of this second application, he relied on the Supreme Court’s subsequent grant of bail to two co-accused whose bail applications had also been rejected by the High Court.
¶ 402Issues
i.Whether the Supreme Court’s grant of bail to similarly situated co-accused constituted a basis to grant bail to the applicant on parity, notwithstanding rejection of his earlier application on merits.
¶ 2, 4–7ii.Whether the applicant should be released on regular bail, and on what conditions.
¶ 803Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides the basis for an application for regular bail.
¶ 1The Court applied the principle of parity, under which bail may be granted to an applicant who is similarly situated to co-accused who have been granted bail, taking into account the circumstances of the case.
¶ 7Provisions in the judgment · 4 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 317Section 111Section 3
04Reasoning
The applicant’s earlier bail rejection did not prevent consideration of the second application in light of the subsequent change in circumstances: the Supreme Court had granted bail to two co-accused whose applications had been rejected by the High Court.
¶ 2, 4The State did not dispute those grants.
¶ 5Considering the case circumstances and the co-accused’s bail orders, the Court held that the applicant was entitled to parity, without expressing any view on the merits of the case.
¶ 6–705Holding
The Court allowed the regular bail application.
¶ 8It directed the applicant’s release upon execution of a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The applicant must not intimidate or induce persons acquainted with the case facts, must not prejudice a fair and expeditious trial, and must attend each trial date until disposal.
¶ 8Original Court PDF
YOGESH @ LALLA YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
