Karnataka High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Continuity of service entitles reinstated workmen to consequential benefits, even when back wages are denied.

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Continuity of service entitles reinstated workmen to consequential benefits, even when back wages are denied.. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Seven employees of LGB Forge Private Limited were dismissed on 29 September 2018 following a domestic enquiry.

Source reference: pp. 2–5, paras. 3–5

The Union sought a reference, and the Labour Court partly allowed it, directing reinstatement with continuity of service but denying back wages and consequential benefits.

Source reference: pp. 2–5, paras. 3–5

The Union challenged the denial of those benefits, contending that the workers had remained unemployed and without earnings after their dismissal.

Source reference: pp. 5–6, para. 6
02

Issues

1. Whether, after ordering reinstatement with continuity of service, the Labour Court’s denial of consequential benefits was sustainable

Source reference: pp. 6–7, paras. 8–9

2. Whether the Labour Court’s denial of back wages warranted interference

Source reference: p. 7, para. 9
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the principle that, where reinstatement is ordered with continuity of service, the workmen are entitled to the benefits attached to that continuity.

Source reference: p. 7, para. 9

The Court did not expressly rely on any statutory provision or precedent.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Labour Court had held the dismissal illegal and ordered reinstatement with continuity of service. The High Court reasoned that consequential benefits arising from that continuity should therefore follow, making their denial unsustainable.

Source reference: p. 7, para. 9

Although the Court noted that evidence of the workers’ unemployment had not been properly considered, it concluded that the denial of back wages did not warrant interference.

Source reference: pp. 6–7, paras. 8–9
05

Holding

The writ petition was partly allowed. The Labour Court’s award was modified to entitle the workmen to all consequential benefits arising from continuity of service, which the employer was directed to grant within one month of receiving the certified copy of the order.

The denial of back wages remained undisturbed.

Source reference: pp. 7–8, paras. 9–10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Industrial Disputes Act, 19471

Section 2
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYvsTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR,

Karnataka High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment