01Facts
IIFL Finance Limited challenged a police notice dated 15 April 2023, issued to ICICI Bank under Sections 91 and 92 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, directing a debit-freeze of the company’s corporate bank account in connection with a cyber-fraud investigation.
p. 3 · ¶ 1The company stated that its account was used for ordinary lending and collection transactions, while the amount involved in the alleged offence was Rs. 1,98,797.
p. 5 · ¶ 6The petitioner clarified that its challenge was confined to the police notice.
p. 3 · ¶ 1The Court had granted interim relief on 27 April 2023.
p. 3 · ¶ 102Issues
i.1. Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief against the police notice directing a debit-freeze of its bank account.
p. 3, 5 · ¶ 1, 6ii.2. Whether the petitioner’s case was governed by the relief granted in the cited precedent concerning a similar issue.
pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8–1003Law Applied
The impugned notice was stated to have been issued under Sections 91 and 92 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
p. 3 · ¶ 1The Court relied on its order dated 16 October 2026 in Muthoot Finance Limited v. State of Karnataka and Others, W.P. No. 1567 of 2026, which treated the issue before it as covered by the order in Muthoot Finance Limited v. State of Karnataka and Another, W.P. No. 25563 of 2024, affirmed in W.A. No. 1653 of 2024.
pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8The present judgment does not set out the terms of those directions; it adopts them only to the extent applicable to this case.
p. 7 · ¶ 10Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 91Section 92
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 107
04Reasoning
The Court noted that the parties did not dispute that the issue was covered by the order in W.P. No. 1567 of 2026.
p. 7 · ¶ 8–9As that order relied on a similar order affirmed by a Division Bench, the Court found no justification to take a different view. It therefore extended the benefit of the earlier directions to IIFL Finance, subject to the conditions in that order insofar as applicable.
p. 7 · ¶ 9–1005Holding
The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the directions in W.P. No. 1567 of 2026, subject to the conditions applicable to the petitioner’s case.
p. 8 · ¶ 10No order was made as to costs.
p. 8 · ¶ 10Original Court PDF
IIFL FINANCE LIMITEDvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
