01Facts
The appellants, accused Nos. 2 and 3, were arrested on 23 December 2025 in Crime No. 999/2025 of Madanayakanahalli Police Station.
p. 3The charge sheet alleged offences under Sections 105, 115(2), 118(1) and (2), 127(2), and 238 read with Sections 3(5), 3(6) and 3(7) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; the investigating officer had dropped the originally registered offences under Sections 103(1) and 127(3) BNS
p. 3, 5After the Special Court dismissed their bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the appellants appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act.
pp. 1, 3–4They relied on bail granted to other accused in connected appeals; the respondents did not dispute that those accused had been granted bail.
p. 402Issues
i.Whether the appellants should be enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS after the Special Court rejected their application.
pp. 3–4ii.Whether the grant of bail to other accused in the case supported granting bail to the appellants.
p. 4, 603Law Applied
Section 483 BNSS provides the basis for the bail application considered by the Court, while Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act provided the appellate route against the Special Court’s order.
pp. 1, 3–4The Court noted that the charged offence under Section 105 BNS is punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term that may extend to ten years, and with fine.
p. 5In deciding the appeal, the Court considered the nature and gravity of the offence, the appellants’ prior antecedents, and the fact that other accused had been granted bail.
p. 6Provisions in the judgment · 9 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 105Section 115Section 118Section 127Section 238Section 3Section 103
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
04Reasoning
The Court considered the charge sheet and noted that the investigation had resulted in charges under Section 105 BNS, among other provisions, rather than the originally registered offences under Sections 103(1) and 127(3) BNS.
p. 5In assessing bail, it weighed the nature and gravity of the alleged offence and the appellants’ prior antecedents against the fact that other accused had already been granted bail; the respondents did not dispute that circumstance.
p. 4, 6On that basis, the Court allowed the appeal.
p. 605Holding
The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Special Court’s order dated 5 March 2026, and allowed the appellants’ bail application under Section 483 BNSS.
p. 6It ordered their release on a self-bond of ₹1,00,000 each, with one surety for the like sum, subject to conditions that they not tamper with or threaten prosecution witnesses and appear before the trial Court on all hearing dates.
pp. 6–7Original Court PDF
NAVEEN N AvsSTATE BY MADANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
