01Facts
The petitioner, a Karnataka Government undertaking and beneficiary of the land acquisition, challenged the judgment and award dated 11 April 2022 in LAC No. 713/2019.
pp. 3–4It contended that it had not been impleaded before the Reference Court, although it would be liable for the enhanced compensation.
pp. 3–4Relying on a Coordinate Bench decision in W.P. Nos. 102697/2025 and 103117/2025, the petitioner sought to have the award set aside and the reference proceedings reopened with the petitioner joined as a party.
p. 3The landowners’ counsel also sought clarification concerning the amount permitted to be withdrawn from compensation deposited in the proceedings.
pp. 4–502Issues
i.Whether the Reference Court’s award should be set aside and the reference proceedings restored because the beneficiary was not impleaded.
pp. 3–4ii.Whether the direction concerning withdrawal of deposited compensation should be modified to make withdrawals subject to the outcome of the reference proceedings.
pp. 4–603Law Applied
The petition was brought under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
p. 2The Court applied the approach adopted by the Coordinate Bench in W.P. Nos. 102697/2025 and 103117/2025, namely, setting aside the impugned awards, restoring the reference proceedings, and permitting the beneficiary to be impleaded so that the matter could be reconsidered with the relevant parties before the Reference Court.
pp. 3, 5–6The Court also directed that any withdrawal of compensation would remain subject to the final outcome of the reference proceedings.
p. 504Reasoning
The Court accepted the petitioner’s submission that the dispute was identical to that addressed by the Coordinate Bench.
pp. 3–6Because the petitioner was the beneficiary and asserted that it would be answerable for the enhanced compensation, the Court followed the Coordinate Bench’s procedure and restored the reference proceedings so the petitioner could be joined and the matter reconsidered in accordance with law.
pp. 3–6On the withdrawal issue, it clarified that any amount withdrawn by the landowners would be subject to the Reference Court’s final decision.
p. 505Holding
The High Court allowed the writ petition in part.
pp. 5–7It set aside the judgment and award dated 11 April 2022 and restored the reference proceedings.
pp. 5–7The petitioner was directed to appear before the Reference Court on 30 October 2026 at 11:00 a.m.; it may then be impleaded, after which the other parties are to be notified.
pp. 5–7The parties’ submissions on the merits remain open, and the Reference Court is to conclude the proceedings within six months from the appearance of all parties.
pp. 5–7Any withdrawal of compensation is subject to the final outcome of the reference proceedings.
p. 5Original Court PDF
KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LIMITEDvsTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
