Karnataka High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceCivil Law

Karnataka HC Transfers Challenge To Civil Court Order To District Court, Citing Supreme Court-Affirmed Jurisdiction Ruling

SRI. THIMMARAYAPPAv.SRI. MUNIVENKATASWAMY

Karnataka HC Transfers Challenge To Civil Court Order To District Court, Citing Supreme Court-Affirmed Jurisdiction Ruling. SRI. THIMMARAYAPPA vs SRI. MUNIVENKATASWAMY. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the appeal was maintainable before the High Court under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964

The court held

The High Court held the appeal not maintainable before it and disposed of it for statistical purposes

It also directed

It directed the Registry to transfer the case record, including any pending applications, to the Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to the competent appellate court.

The parties were directed to appear before the District Judge on 25 November 2026; any interim order was to continue until further orders of the learned District Judge

01Facts

The appellants filed an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC challenging the order dated 3 October 2023 on I.A. No. 1 in O.S. No. 232/2022, passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Chikkaballapur

p. 7

The High Court considered the appeal’s maintainability under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, in light of a Division Bench decision in Smt. Narayanamma v. State of Karnataka, which the Supreme Court had affirmed

p. 8

02Issues

i.Whether the appeal was maintainable before the High Court under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964

p. 8

ii.Whether the appeal and any pending applications should be transferred to the competent District Court for adjudication

pp. 8–9

03Law Applied

Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 governs the relevant appellate jurisdiction.

p. 8

The Court applied that provision as interpreted in the Division Bench decision in Smt. Narayanamma v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 17588 of 2024 c/w W.A. No. 200260 of 2025, dated 8 July 2026, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in SLP(C) No. 025075/2026 on 3 August 2026

p. 8

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

KARNATAKA CIVIL COURTS ACT, 1964 Section 19

04Reasoning

Applying Section 19(1) as interpreted by the cited, Supreme Court-affirmed decision, the High Court concluded that this appeal was not maintainable before it

p. 8

It therefore directed transfer of the record to the Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to the appellate court having jurisdiction. The Court expressly left the merits and the parties’ contentions open

pp. 8–10

05Holding

The High Court held the appeal not maintainable before it and disposed of it for statistical purposes

pp. 8–9

It directed the Registry to transfer the case record, including any pending applications, to the Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to the competent appellate court.

pp. 9–10

The parties were directed to appear before the District Judge on 25 November 2026; any interim order was to continue until further orders of the learned District Judge

pp. 9–10
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI. THIMMARAYAPPAvsSRI. MUNIVENKATASWAMY

Karnataka High Court · October 17, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment