Karnataka High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceCivil Law

Karnataka HC Transfers CPC Appeal To District Court Under Section 19(1), Continuing Interim Order Pending Further Orders

SMT NAGARATHNA MURTHYv.SRI ANJINAPPA

Karnataka HC Transfers CPC Appeal To District Court Under Section 19(1), Continuing Interim Order Pending Further Orders. SMT NAGARATHNA MURTHY vs SRI ANJINAPPA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the appeal was maintainable before the High Court under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964.

The court held

The Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before the High Court and disposed of it for statistical purposes.

It also directed

It directed the Registry to transfer the entire record and any pending applications to the Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to the competent appellate court; left all merits and contentions open; directed the parties to appear before the District Judge on 24 November 2026 without further notice; and continued the interim order until further orders of the District Judge.

01Facts

The appellant filed an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC against the order dated 4 December 2025 on I.A. No. 15 in O.S. No. 155/2018, pending before the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli.

p. 8

The High Court considered the appeal’s maintainability under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, in light of a Division Bench judgment that had been affirmed by the Supreme Court.

p. 8

02Issues

i.1. Whether the appeal was maintainable before the High Court under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964.

p. 8

ii.2. If not maintainable, whether the matter should be transferred to the competent District Court for adjudication.

pp. 8–9

03Law Applied

The Court applied Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, and followed the Division Bench decision in Smt. Narayanamma v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 17588 of 2024 (GM-RES) c/w W.A. No. 200260 of 2025 (GM-RES), dated 8 July 2026, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in SLP(C) No. 025075/2026 on 3 August 2026.

p. 8

Applying those authorities, the Court held that this appeal was not maintainable before it and directed that it be transferred to the competent District Court.

pp. 8–9

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

KARNATAKA CIVIL COURTS ACT, 1964 Section 19

04Reasoning

The appeal arose from an interlocutory order and was presented under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC. The High Court concluded, by applying Section 19(1) and the cited, Supreme Court-affirmed Division Bench decision, that it lacked the proper appellate forum for adjudicating the appeal.

p. 8

It therefore directed transfer of the record and any pending applications to the District Court for assignment to the competent appellate court, without expressing any view on the merits.

pp. 9–10

05Holding

The Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before the High Court and disposed of it for statistical purposes.

pp. 8–9

It directed the Registry to transfer the entire record and any pending applications to the Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to the competent appellate court; left all merits and contentions open; directed the parties to appear before the District Judge on 24 November 2026 without further notice; and continued the interim order until further orders of the District Judge.

pp. 9–10
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT NAGARATHNA MURTHYvsSRI ANJINAPPA

Karnataka High Court · October 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment