01Facts
The petitioner sought removal of his name from History Sheet No. 02 of 2025 maintained by the third respondent and had submitted a representation to the respondents on 24 August 2026.
p. 1 · ¶ 1 · p. 2As the representation had not been considered, he filed this writ petition seeking a direction for its consideration
p. 1 · ¶ 1 · p. 2The Court noted that the principles governing the opening, retention and discontinuance of history sheets had been addressed in W.P. (MD) No. 19651 of 2017 and set out in a Director General of Police circular dated 24 April 2019.
¶ 2–3 · pp. 2–502Issues
i.Whether the petitioner was entitled
Original Court PDF
SenthilnathanvsThe State of Tamilnadu
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
