01Facts
The claimant, aged 24, sustained serious injuries, including an above-knee amputation of his right lower limb, when his motorcycle was involved in a collision with a car on 30 December 2020.
pp. 2–4, 6The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal found the car driver negligent and awarded total compensation of ₹26,75,000, including ₹13,82,000 for permanent disability and loss of earning power.
pp. 2–4, 6The claimant appealed, seeking enhancement.
pp. 2–4, 6During the appeal, a Medical Board assessed his permanent disability at 65%.
pp. 2–4, 602Issues
i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the claimant’s notional monthly income and compensation for permanent disability and loss of earning power required enhancement.
pp. 5–7ii.2. Whether the compensation awarded under the other heads required interference.
p. 5, 703Law Applied
The claim was brought under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the appeal under Section 173 of that Act.
p. 2, 7In assessing loss of earning capacity, the Court considered the claimant’s age, injuries, and Medical Board assessment of permanent disability, and applied the multiplier method.
p. 2, 7It relied on National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, 2017 (2) TNMAC 609 (SC), for adding 40% future prospects to the income assessment of the claimant.
p. 2, 7Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173Section 166
04Reasoning
The Court accepted the Medical Board’s assessment of 65% permanent disability and found that the above-knee amputation would affect the claimant’s earning capacity and cause functional disability.
pp. 6–8Given the claimant’s age and the 2020 accident date, it held that the Tribunal’s notional monthly income of ₹8,000 was inadequate and fixed it at ₹14,000.
pp. 6–8Applying 40% future prospects, a multiplier of 18, and 65% disability, the Court calculated compensation for permanent disability and loss of earning power at ₹27,51,840.
pp. 6–8It found the Tribunal’s awards under the remaining heads reasonable and left them unchanged.
pp. 6–805Holding
The appeal was partly allowed, and total compensation was enhanced from ₹26,75,000 to ₹40,44,840, with interest at 7.5% per annum from the claim-petition date to deposit, subject to the exclusion of interest for any delay period specified in the Court’s earlier order.
pp. 8–9The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, less amounts already deposited, within six weeks.
pp. 8–9The claimant was permitted to withdraw the amount upon application, and the decree was to be drawn after payment of any court fee due on the enhancement.
pp. 8–9No costs were awarded.
pp. 8–9Original Court PDF
M.VIJAYvsK. Singaravelan
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
