Odisha High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Odisha HC Grants Six-Week Interim Bail To Accused In ₹27 Lakh Medical Admission Case, Taking Note Of His Refund Offer

ROHIT MAHAPATRAv.STATE OF ODISHA

Odisha HC Grants Six-Week Interim Bail To Accused In ₹27 Lakh Medical Admission Case, Taking Note Of His Refund Offer. ROHIT MAHAPATRA vs STATE OF ODISHA. Odisha High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner should be released on bail pending determination of his application for regular bail.

The court held

The Court directed that the petitioner be released on interim bail for six weeks upon furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 with two local solvent sureties for the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court in seisin.

It also directed

That court may impose additional conditions, and breach of any condition may entail cancellation of bail.

The petitioner was directed to surrender before the concerned court and produce a surrender certificate on or before the next listing.

The matter was listed for the week commencing 4 January 2027.

Although the petitioner had expressed willingness to refund ₹19.85 lakh within four weeks of release, the operative order did not expressly make repayment a condition of bail.

01Facts

The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

pp. 1–3 · ¶ 3–6

The informant alleged that the petitioner received ₹77 lakh to facilitate her daughter’s admission to a medical college; the petitioner’s counsel acknowledged an alleged payment of ₹27 lakh, while the informant’s counsel stated that ₹7 lakh had been paid to the college and that the petitioner had offered to refund ₹19.85 lakh.

pp. 1–3 · ¶ 3–6

The petitioner had been in custody since 8 August 2026, the investigation was complete, and a charge-sheet had been filed.

pp. 1–3 · ¶ 3–6

The petitioner also had one criminal antecedent, stated to be unrelated to the present allegation.

pp. 1–3 · ¶ 3–6

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner should be released on bail pending determination of his application for regular bail.

pp. 1–3 · ¶ 3–7

ii.2. Whether interim bail should be granted subject to conditions, having regard to the circumstances placed before the Court, including the petitioner’s custody, completion of investigation, and stated willingness to refund part of the amount.

pp. 2–4 · ¶ 4–9

03Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides the relevant statutory basis for the petitioner’s bail application.

p. 1, 3 · ¶ 3, 7–8

Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 were the alleged offences in the underlying case.

p. 1, 3 · ¶ 3, 7–8

The order cites no precedent and does not articulate a broader test for granting bail; it records an interim-bail decision based on the circumstances of the case and permits the court in seisin to impose further appropriate conditions.

p. 1, 3 · ¶ 3, 7–8

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 406Section 420

04Reasoning

The Court considered the submissions that the petitioner had been in custody since 8 August 2026 and that the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet filed.

pp. 2–3 · ¶ 4–7

It also noted the parties’ competing accounts concerning the alleged payments, the undisputed payment of ₹7 lakh to the medical college, and the petitioner’s affidavit expressing willingness to refund ₹19.85 lakh.

pp. 2–3 · ¶ 4–7

On that record, the Court ordered interim bail for six weeks; it did not determine the truth of the allegations or grant final regular bail.

pp. 2–3 · ¶ 4–7

05Holding

The Court directed that the petitioner be released on interim bail for six weeks upon furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 with two local solvent sureties for the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court in seisin.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 7–10

That court may impose additional conditions, and breach of any condition may entail cancellation of bail.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 7–10

The petitioner was directed to surrender before the concerned court and produce a surrender certificate on or before the next listing.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 7–10

The matter was listed for the week commencing 4 January 2027.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 7–10

Although the petitioner had expressed willingness to refund ₹19.85 lakh within four weeks of release, the operative order did not expressly make repayment a condition of bail.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 7–10
Odisha High Court

Original Court PDF

ROHIT MAHAPATRAvsSTATE OF ODISHA

Odisha High Court · November 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment