Gujarat High Court
Administrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Panchayat encroachment notices must comply with Rule 55(2)’s hearing requirements.

MANGALPRAVESH PHULBADAN RAJPUT vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: October 15, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Panchayat encroachment notices must comply with Rule 55(2)’s hearing requirements.. MANGALPRAVESH PHULBADAN RAJPUT vs STATE OF GUJARAT. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged notices dated 17 and 27 July 2026 directing removal of an alleged encroachment on Government land within two days and requiring documents supporting the petitioner’s claim to the property

Source reference: para. 2, 7

The respondents raised factual allegations concerning the construction and the petitioner’s entitlement to the land, but did not dispute that the Rule 55(2) procedure had not been followed

Source reference: para. 6
02

Issues

Whether the notices directing removal of the alleged encroachment within two days could be acted upon without following the procedure under Rule 55(2), including providing an opportunity of hearing

Source reference: para. 4, 6–8

Whether the petitioner was entitled to further time to produce documents supporting the claim to the property before the respondents took action

Source reference: para. 7–8
03

Law Applied

Section 105 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 and Rule 55(2) of the Gujarat Panchayats (Procedure) Rules, 1997 were invoked in relation to action concerning the alleged encroachment; the Court noted that Rule 55(2) required an opportunity of personal hearing

Source reference: para. 4, 6

The petitioner also relied on Wind Word India Ltd. v. Shree Tebhada Gram Panchayat, 2023(0)AIJEL-HC-245521

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

Although the respondents raised serious allegations about the land and its construction, they could not controvert that the procedure under Rule 55(2) had not been followed

Source reference: para. 6

Without deciding the parties’ competing claims on the merits, the Court addressed the procedural defect by treating the notices as show-cause notices and directing that the petitioner receive time to produce documents and an opportunity for a hearing through a representative

Source reference: para. 8
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the petition and made the Rule absolute to the stated extent.

It directed that the notices dated 17 and 27 July 2026 be treated as show-cause notices, allowing the petitioner until 24 October 2026 to produce supporting documents and requiring that the petitioner’s representative be heard

Source reference: para. 8(i)

If the petitioner failed to justify the claim against the allegation of encroachment, the respondents could take appropriate action in accordance with law after that date

Source reference: para. 8(ii)

No order as to costs was made

Source reference: para. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Gujarat Panchayats Act, 19931

Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

MANGALPRAVESH PHULBADAN RAJPUTvsSTATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High Court · October 15, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment