Chhattisgarh High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Pay-Scale Revision Representation Must Be Considered Under the Applicable Notification Within Six Months

VIDESHI KUMAR PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 06, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Pay-Scale Revision Representation Must Be Considered Under the Applicable Notification Within Six Months. VIDESHI KUMAR PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a former daily-wage employee whose services were subsequently regularised, sought regular pay from 1 August 1991, a higher pay scale following revision under a State notification, and arrears with interest

Source reference: para. 1

He relied on the Coordinate Bench’s order in Dwarikadas Vaishnav & Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) & Others, WPS No. 2904 of 2005, dated 5 December 2012, and requested that his claim be considered in light of the notification referred to by counsel

Source reference: para. 2

The State submitted that the issue had previously been considered with reference to the State Administrative Tribunal’s decision in Laxmi Narayan Upadhyay v. State of M.P., but agreed to consider a fresh representation

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioner’s claim for pay-scale revision should be considered by the competent authority upon submission of a fresh representation.

Source reference: para. 4

2. Whether the petitioner was entitled, in this proceeding, to an order granting the claimed pay scales and arrears.

Source reference: paras. 1, 4–5
03

Law Applied

The Court applied no statutory provision or substantive legal test to determine the petitioner’s entitlement to a particular pay scale.

Source reference: paras. 2, 4

It referred to the Coordinate Bench’s order in Dwarikadas Vaishnav, under which petitioners had been granted liberty to submit fresh representations, and directed consideration of the petitioner’s representation in light of the relevant State notification.

Source reference: paras. 2, 4
04

Reasoning

In light of the parties’ submissions—including the State’s agreement to consider a fresh representation—the Court disposed of the petition by providing a procedural remedy rather than adjudicating the petitioner’s entitlement to regular or higher pay

Source reference: paras. 3–4

It left the merits to the competent authority, directing that the representation be considered in light of the aforesaid notification.

Source reference: para. 4
05

Holding

The petition was disposed of.

The petitioner may file a fresh representation before the competent authority, which must consider and decide it in light of the aforesaid notification, preferably within six months of receiving or being produced with a certified copy of the order.

Source reference: paras. 4–5

No pay-scale enhancement, arrears, or interest was directly awarded.

Source reference: paras. 4–5
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

VIDESHI KUMAR PATELvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment