Karnataka High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Pre-grant-in-aid service counts for notional pay fixation and pensionary benefits, but not salary arrears.

SRI DINESH H B vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Pre-grant-in-aid service counts for notional pay fixation and pensionary benefits, but not salary arrears.. SRI DINESH H B vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners, teaching and non-teaching employees of aided educational institutions, sought recognition of their service from their respective initial appointment dates, including service before their posts were admitted to grant-in-aid.

Source reference: pp. 11–12, para. 2

They requested consequential benefits including pay fixation, increments, seniority, and pensionary benefits, relying on the decision in W.A. No. 2476/2015 and connected matters.

Source reference: pp. 11–12, para. 2

The State submitted that the relief was limited by the appellate court’s clarification in paragraph 61 of that decision.

Source reference: p. 12, para. 5
02

Issues

1. Whether service rendered before a post’s admission to grant-in-aid must be reckoned for notional pay fixation and consequential pensionary and other service benefits.

Source reference: pp. 11–13, paras. 2, 5–6

2. Whether employees are entitled to salary arrears or other monetary benefits from the State for the pre-grant period.

Source reference: p. 13, para. 6
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the clarification in paragraph 61 of the judgment in W.A. No. 2476/2015 and connected matters, dated 24 July 2026.

Source reference: p. 13, para. 6

Under that clarification, service during the non-grant period is to be considered for notional pay fixation as on the date the post is admitted to grant-in-aid and for consequential pensionary and other service benefits; however, the State is not liable for salary arrears or other monetary benefits for the pre-grant period.

Source reference: p. 13, para. 6

The Court also referred to Annexure I of the Rules, 1999, under which the institution’s management bears responsibility for salary and benefits until the post is admitted to grant-in-aid.

Source reference: p. 13, para. 6
04

Reasoning

The Court treated paragraph 61 of the appellate judgment as defining both the scope and limits of the petitioners’ entitlement.

Source reference: pp. 13–14, paras. 6–7

It therefore directed that their pre-grant service be reckoned for notional pay fixation and consequential benefits, while preserving the rule that salary and other monetary benefits for the non-grant period remain the management’s responsibility, not the State’s.

Source reference: pp. 13–14, paras. 6–7
05

Holding

The petition was allowed and disposed of.

Respondents 1, 2, and 4 to 6 were directed to reckon the petitioners’ service from their respective dates of appointment for notional pay fixation and calculation of pension and other service benefits, and to complete the consideration within six months.

Source reference: p. 14, para. 7

No State liability for pre-grant salary arrears or other monetary benefits was recognised.

Source reference: p. 13, para. 6
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI DINESH H BvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment