Karnataka High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Pre-grant service counts for notional pay fixation and consequential benefits, not salary arrears.

G C DHANANJAPPA vs THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Pre-grant service counts for notional pay fixation and consequential benefits, not salary arrears.. G C DHANANJAPPA vs THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners, employees or former employees of private educational institutions, sought financial and consequential service benefits by counting their service from their dates of appointment, including periods before their posts were admitted to grant-in-aid.

Source reference: paras. 2–3

They relied on the decision in W.P. No. 21216/2014 and connected matters, as affirmed in writ appeals, and sought consideration of their representation dated 27 August 2026.

Source reference: paras. 2–3

The State submitted that the relief was governed by paragraph 61 of the appellate judgment.

Source reference: paras. 4–6
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioners’ pre-grant-in-aid service should be reckoned for pay fixation and consequential service benefits.

Source reference: paras. 3, 7–8

2. Whether that reckoning entitles the petitioners to salary arrears or other monetary benefits for the pre-grant period.

Source reference: para. 7
03

Law Applied

The Court applied paragraph 61 of the judgment in W.A. No. 2476/2015 and connected matters.

Source reference: para. 7

Under that ruling, service rendered before a post is admitted to grant-in-aid is to be counted for notional pay fixation as on the date of admission to grant-in-aid and for consequential benefits, including pension and other service benefits.

Source reference: para. 7

The State is not liable for salary or other monetary benefits for the pre-grant period; under Annexure I of the Rules, 1999, the liability to pay salary and benefits until admission to grant-in-aid rests with the institution’s management.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court treated paragraph 61 of the appellate judgment as controlling the petitioners’ entitlement.

Source reference: para. 7

It therefore directed the authorities to reckon the petitioners’ service from their dates of appointment only to the extent necessary to provide the benefits flowing from that paragraph.

Source reference: paras. 7–8

This preserves notional fixation and consequential service benefits while excluding any claim against the State for pre-grant salary arrears or other monetary benefits.

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The petition was allowed and disposed of.

Respondents 1–4 were directed to reckon the petitioners’ service from their dates of appointment for the purposes of benefits permitted by paragraph 61 of the appellate judgment, and to complete consideration and pass appropriate orders within six months.

Source reference: paras. 8–10

The relief does not include salary arrears or other monetary benefits from the State for the pre-grant period.

Source reference: para. 7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

G C DHANANJAPPAvsTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

Karnataka High Court · October 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment