Delhi High CourtAdministrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Public interest in drainage maintenance overrides temporary vending rights, justifying mandatory removal of infrastructure-hindering encroachments.

Ramesh Chandv.Public Works Department And Ors

Public interest in drainage maintenance overrides temporary vending rights, justifying mandatory removal of infrastructure-hindering encroachments.. Ramesh Chand vs Public Works Department And Ors. Delhi High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the removal of the petitioners' vends was legally justified in light of public interest and the maintenance of essential drainage infrastructure

The court held

The Court disposed of the writ petitions and issued the following directions: (i) It upheld the PWD's right to clear encroachments and ordered that no petitioner be allowed to re-install vends in the Timarpur area until the Scrutiny Committee's report is filed

It also directed

(ii) It mandated the MCD's Scrutiny Committee to verify the authenticity of the petitioners' documents within one month

(iii) It expanded the Committee’s Terms of Reference to include identifying and recommending strict action against "erring officials" who connived in issuing fabricated licenses

(iv) It authorized the PWD to continue desilting and road repairs to eliminate waterlogging

The matter was listed for compliance on May 22, 2026

01Facts

Eight petitioners, claiming to be valid "Tehbazari" (street vending) license holders in the Timarpur area of Delhi, challenged a demolition and anti-encroachment drive conducted by the Public Works Department (PWD) and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on February 5, 2026

pp. 3-5, para 2-3

The petitioners sought the restoration of their vending sites and the right to operate until the expiration of their licenses in March 2026

¶ 6

The PWD contended that the removals were necessary because the vends were situated over drains and manholes, causing severe waterlogging and blocking maintenance

¶ 8, 11, 13

Simultaneously, the MCD alleged that several licenses relied upon by the petitioners were fabricated through the connivance of "unscrupulous officials"

¶ 6, 20

02Issues

i.1. Whether the removal of the petitioners' vends was legally justified in light of public interest and the maintenance of essential drainage infrastructure

p. 18, para 18

ii.2. Whether the petitioners possess valid and genuine Tehbazari rights to occupy the sites in question

p. 19, para 24

iii.3. What actions should be taken against officials suspected of fabricating vending licenses

p. 21, para 28

03Law Applied

The Court exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

p. 21, para 28

It applied the principle that Tehbazari rights are "purely temporary" and holders must vacate sites for government work or in the public interest

p. 9, para 13

The Court also emphasized the statutory role of the Town Vending Committee and relevant MCD Acts/Rules in verifying the authenticity of vending licenses

pp. 19-20, para 24

04Reasoning

The Court perused photographic evidence submitted by the PWD, which clearly showed that shopkeepers and dhaba owners had covered manholes and choked the drainage system, leading to severe waterlogging

pp. 10-18, para 14-15

The Court reasoned that such encroachments are a primary cause of Delhi's seasonal waterlogging and that their removal is "absolutely essential" for civic welfare

¶ 16-18

Regarding the petitioners' claims of legality, the Court took note of the MCD’s admission that its own officials may have been involved in the "creation and fabrication" of the licenses

¶ 19-20, 25

The Court held that since the documents' authenticity was in doubt, no rights could be claimed until the newly formed Scrutiny Committee completed its fact-finding mission

¶ 24

The Court determined that the public’s right to a functional drainage system outweighed the petitioners' temporary vending claims

¶ 17-18

05Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petitions and issued the following directions: (i) It upheld the PWD's right to clear encroachments and ordered that no petitioner be allowed to re-install vends in the Timarpur area until the Scrutiny Committee's report is filed

p. 21, para 31, 35

(ii) It mandated the MCD's Scrutiny Committee to verify the authenticity of the petitioners' documents within one month

¶ 29

(iii) It expanded the Committee’s Terms of Reference to include identifying and recommending strict action against "erring officials" who connived in issuing fabricated licenses

pp. 21, para 27-28

(iv) It authorized the PWD to continue desilting and road repairs to eliminate waterlogging

pp. 21-22, para 32

The matter was listed for compliance on May 22, 2026

p. 22, para 36
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Ramesh ChandvsPublic Works Department And Ors

Delhi High Court · April 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment