Karnataka High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Regular bail is justified where the complainant turns hostile and the record discloses no sufficient prima facie grounds.

SRI BASAVARAJ S/O SURESH KAMATIv.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Regular bail is justified where the complainant turns hostile and the record discloses no sufficient prima facie grounds.. SRI BASAVARAJ S/O SURESH KAMATI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the petitioner had made out a case for regular bail in light of the charge-sheet material and the alleged extra-judicial confession.

The court held

The Court allowed the petition and directed the trial court to release the petitioner on regular bail in Sessions Case No. 5088 of 2025, subject to conditions.

It also directed

These included a personal bond of ₹2,00,000 with two sureties, non-interference with prosecution witnesses, cooperation with the Investigating Officer, avoidance of similar offences, and fortnightly attendance at the police station for six months or until filing of the final report, whichever was earlier.

The prosecution may seek cancellation of bail for violation of the conditions.

01Facts

The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case arising from the death of his brother, who was found with severe head injuries on 8 May 2025.

pp. 2–4

The prosecution alleged that the petitioner committed the murder and made an extra-judicial confession to their father.

pp. 2–4

The father, who lodged the complaint, was examined as PW1 but turned hostile and denied that the petitioner had committed the murder.

pp. 2–4

The petitioner was in judicial custody, and the case was pending before the VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi, sitting at Chikkodi.

pp. 2–4

02Issues

i.Whether the petitioner had made out a case for regular bail in light of the charge-sheet material and the alleged extra-judicial confession.

pp. 4–5

ii.Whether the petitioner should be released on bail subject to conditions, notwithstanding the seriousness of the alleged offence and the prosecution’s submission that material witnesses remained to be examined.

pp. 3–4, 6–7

03Law Applied

The Court considered the petitioner’s application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

p. 5

In deciding bail, it identified the relevant considerations as the nature and circumstances of the offence; the petitioner’s position in relation to the victim and witnesses; the risk of absconding, reoffending, or tampering with witnesses; and the petitioner’s character and antecedents.

p. 5

The Court also stated that a bail court should not conduct a mini-trial by scanning the prosecution case in detail.

p. 5

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 103Section 238

04Reasoning

The Court noted that the prosecution relied on an alleged extra-judicial confession to the petitioner’s father.

pp. 4–5

However, the father had turned hostile as PW1 and denied the suggestions that the petitioner had murdered his brother.

pp. 4–5

Having considered the material on record without conducting a mini-trial, the Court concluded that there were no reasonable and sufficient grounds, at that stage, to believe that the petitioner was guilty of the alleged offences and that he had made out a case for bail.

pp. 4–5

05Holding

The Court allowed the petition and directed the trial court to release the petitioner on regular bail in Sessions Case No. 5088 of 2025, subject to conditions.

pp. 5–7

These included a personal bond of ₹2,00,000 with two sureties, non-interference with prosecution witnesses, cooperation with the Investigating Officer, avoidance of similar offences, and fortnightly attendance at the police station for six months or until filing of the final report, whichever was earlier.

pp. 5–7

The prosecution may seek cancellation of bail for violation of the conditions.

pp. 5–7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI BASAVARAJ S/O SURESH KAMATIvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment