Karnataka High Court
Administrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Revenue authorities must promptly determine property-entry applications after verifying statutory compliance.

SMT K SUDHAMMA vs THE JOINT COMMISSIONER

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 17, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Revenue authorities must promptly determine property-entry applications after verifying statutory compliance.. SMT K SUDHAMMA vs THE JOINT COMMISSIONER. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners claimed ownership of 10½ guntas in Sy. No. 1521/1, Agara Village, and sought revenue entries for the property from the first respondent.

Source reference: p. 3

In W.P. No. 443/2021, other persons had challenged a Deputy Commissioner’s decision restoring entries in Column No. 9 of the RTC; this Court declined to interfere by order dated 14 March 2022.

Source reference: p. 4

The petitioners later applied for entries with the BBMP/GBA. Following an endorsement dated 11 June 2025 requiring title documents, the petitioners produced documents, but no further action was taken.

Source reference: p. 5

They sought a direction requiring the first respondent to act on their representation.

Source reference: pp. 2–3
02

Issues

Whether the petitioners were entitled to a direction requiring the authorities to consider their request for revenue entries in respect of the subject property.

Source reference: pp. 3, 6–7

Whether the Assistant Revenue Officer should verify the applicable legal compliances and communicate the outcome within a specified time.

Source reference: pp. 6–8
03

Law Applied

Section 149 of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 2024 (GBG Act) contemplates registration of revenue entries consequent to a transfer or devolution of interest.

Source reference: p. 6

For property within BBMP/GBA limits, property tax and other duties under Chapter XIV of the GBG Act may also apply.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

The authority must consider the request under Section 149 or any other applicable provision, verify the required compliances, and act without undue delay.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

The Court did not determine the petitioners’ title or direct that entries be made.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Assistant Revenue Officer could not be required to make revenue entries merely on the petitioners’ request, because the relevant statutory compliances and supporting material first had to be examined.

Source reference: pp. 5–7

However, the petitioners had produced documents after the endorsement, and the authority had not acted thereafter; the Court therefore found that the matter required timely consideration.

Source reference: p. 6

It directed examination of the title documents and other material under the applicable provisions, without insisting on notice to the petitioners who had lost in W.P. No. 443/2021.

Source reference: pp. 7–8
05

Holding

The petition was disposed of with directions.

The petitioners may submit a certified copy of the order and all title documents to the Assistant Revenue Officer within four weeks of receipt. The officer must examine the material for compliance with the law and communicate the outcome within eight weeks of receiving the certified copy, without insisting on notice to the petitioners.

Source reference: pp. 7–8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 20241

Section 149
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT K SUDHAMMAvsTHE JOINT COMMISSIONER

Karnataka High Court · September 17, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment