Uttarakhand High CourtEducation LawEmployment and Labour Law

Uttarakhand HC Upholds 42-Year Age Bar That Defeated Over-43 Applicant’s Mission Inter College Lecturer Bid

SARITA TIWARIv.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand HC Upholds 42-Year Age Bar That Defeated Over-43 Applicant’s Mission Inter College Lecturer Bid. SARITA TIWARI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the appellant’s candidature for appointment as Lecturer (English) in a minority institution could be rejected for exceeding the 42-year upper age limit applicable to government intermediate colleges

The court held

The Court answered the age-limit issue against the appellant and found no reason to interfere with the Single Judge’s judgment.

It also directed

The special appeal was dismissed.

01Facts

Mission Inter College, Pithoragarh advertised a Lecturer (English) vacancy, stating that the academic qualifications and age requirements would be the same as those applicable to appointments in government intermediate colleges

¶ 7

The appellant, who was over 43½ years old when she applied, challenged the rejection of her candidature as over-age

¶ 6

The Single Judge dismissed her writ petition, holding that the prescribed age limit also applied to minority institutions absent a specific legislative exception

¶ 4

In this special appeal, the Court noted that the upper age limit for appointment as a teacher in government intermediate colleges was 42 years and that another candidate had been recommended and appointed to the vacancy

¶ 8–9

02Issues

i.Whether the appellant’s candidature for appointment as Lecturer (English) in a minority institution could be rejected for exceeding the 42-year upper age limit applicable to government intermediate colleges

¶ 6–9

ii.Whether the Single Judge’s dismissal of the writ petition warranted interference in the special appeal

¶ 4, 9–11

03Law Applied

The Court applied the age requirement stated in the recruitment advertisement, which made the age requirements for government intermediate colleges applicable to the advertised post.

¶ 7

It also proceeded on the basis that there was no separate provision governing the upper age limit for teacher appointments in minority institutions; accordingly, the applicable prescribed age limit was not displaced merely because the institution was a minority institution.

¶ 9

04Reasoning

The appellant was over 43½ years old, while the upper age limit applicable to teachers in government intermediate colleges was 42 years.

¶ 6, 8

The advertisement expressly adopted the same age requirements for the vacancy, and the Court found no separate provision for minority institutions that would exempt the appellant from that limit.

¶ 7, 9

It therefore found no basis to fault the Single Judge’s conclusion; it also noted that another candidate had already been appointed to the post.

¶ 9–10

05Holding

The Court answered the age-limit issue against the appellant and found no reason to interfere with the Single Judge’s judgment.

¶ 10–11

The special appeal was dismissed.

¶ 10–11
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

SARITA TIWARIvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment