01Facts
The husband obtained a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the ground of cruelty; the wife’s petition for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed.
pp. 2–3In the appeal, the wife abandoned her challenge to the divorce decree and confined the appeal to permanent alimony.
p. 3She sought ₹15 lakh, while the husband offered ₹5 lakh.
pp. 3–4The record showed that the wife had no independent income; the husband had previously been employed with a gross monthly salary of approximately ₹30,000, had resigned in 2024, and continued to pay instalments on a financed car.
pp. 5–6The husband deposited ₹5 lakh pursuant to an interim direction.
p. 4, 702Issues
i.Whether the High Court, in an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, could determine permanent alimony rather than relegate the wife to a separate application under Section 25.
pp. 8–10ii.Whether, on the evidence and circumstances, permanent alimony of ₹10 lakh was justified.
pp. 5–7, 1003Law Applied
Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, empowers a court, when passing any decree under the Act or at any time subsequent to it, to grant permanent alimony or maintenance, having regard to the respondent’s income and property, the parties’ conduct, and other circumstances of the case.
pp. 8–9The power is not confined to the court that initially passed the decree; an appellate court exercising jurisdiction under Section 28 may itself grant permanent alimony where the record permits determination without further proceedings.
p. 9Provisions in the judgment · 4 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 9Section 13Section 25Section 28
04Reasoning
The Court treated the alimony question as the sole issue because the wife had abandoned her challenge to the divorce decree.
p. 3It found no evidence that the wife had sufficient independent income, while the husband’s prior employment, continuing car-loan payments, and offer to pay ₹5 lakh undermined his assertion that he had no independent income and was wholly dependent on his father’s pension.
pp. 5–7, 10Considering the available record and the parties’ circumstances, the Court held that remitting the matter for a separate application would unnecessarily prolong the litigation and that it could determine the amount in the appeal.
pp. 8–1005Holding
The High Court modified the decree to award the wife ₹10 lakh as permanent alimony, payable within three months of the judgment.
p. 10Any ₹5 lakh already deposited was to be adjusted against that award, with the balance payable within the same period; the wife could apply to the Registrar (Judicial) for disbursement of the deposited amount.
p. 10The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.
p. 10Original Court PDF
SONALISA SATPATHYvsUMANATH DASH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
