01Facts
The petitioner, an intended purchaser, entered into an agreement for sale concerning 2 Kathas 10 Lessas of land covered by Dag No. 652, Patta No. 176, at Village Paka Betbari, Barpeta Revenue Circle, Assam.
p. 2 · ¶ 2Before execution of the agreement, he applied through the Sewa Setu portal on 02.08.2024 for the notified public service of “Composite Land Sale Transfer”; the application was rejected on 14.10.2024.
pp. 2–3 · ¶ 3He submitted a second application on 18.11.2024, which was also rejected on 07.01.2025.
pp. 2–3 · ¶ 3The petitioner alleged that both rejection orders were non-speaking and contrary to the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012.
pp. 2–3 · ¶ 3He subsequently filed a purported first appeal before the District Commissioner, Barpeta, on 10.08.2026, but the appeal was not considered.
p. 3 · ¶ 4He approached the High Court seeking directions for disposal of that appeal and delivery of the notified service.
p. 3 · ¶ 4The State authorities contended that the District Commissioner was not the competent first appellate authority; under the applicable notification, the first appeal lay before the Director of Land Records and Surveys, Assam.
p. 3 · ¶ 502Issues
i.1. Whether the District Commissioner, Barpeta, had jurisdiction to entertain and dispose of the petitioner’s first appeal against rejection of an application for “Composite Land Sale Transfer” under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012.
pp. 3–6 · ¶ 5–8ii.2. Whether the petitioner could still pursue a first appeal before the competent appellate authority after expiry of the statutory limitation period, and whether delay could be condoned.
pp. 5–6 · ¶ 7–9iii.3. Whether the High Court should direct delivery of the notified public service in the writ petition.
p. 3 · ¶ 4 · pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8–1003Law Applied
The Court applied the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012, particularly Section 8(1), which permits a person aggrieved by rejection of a notified public service, or by non-delivery within the prescribed period, to file a first appeal before the notified First Appellate Authority within 30 days; its proviso permits condonation of delay where sufficient cause is shown.
p. 5 · ¶ 7Section 8(4) provides for a second appeal before the notified Second Appellate Authority.
p. 3 · ¶ 5The Revenue and Disaster Management Department’s notification dated 09.07.2024, published on 12.07.2024, notified “Composite Land Sale Transfer” as a public service, prescribed a 45-working-day timeline, designated the Director of Land Records and Surveys, Assam as the First Appellate Authority, and identified the AAT/RTPS Commission as the Second Appellate Authority.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 6An appeal filed before an authority that is not the notified appellate authority cannot be entertained or adjudicated by that authority.
p. 6 · ¶ 8Provisions in the judgment · 6
Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012 Section 8Section 8Section 6Section 8Section 4Section 4
04Reasoning
The Court held that the applicable notification specifically designated the Director of Land Records and Surveys, Assam—not the District Commissioner, Barpeta—as the First Appellate Authority for “Composite Land Sale Transfer”.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 6Consequently, the District Commissioner lacked statutory jurisdiction to entertain or dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, and no mandamus could be issued requiring him to do so.
p. 6 · ¶ 8However, because Section 8(1) permits delayed appeals to be admitted upon satisfaction that sufficient cause prevented timely filing, the petitioner was not without a remedy.
p. 6 · ¶ 9He could file the appeal before the competent authority along with an application for condonation of delay, whereupon the First Appellate Authority was required first to decide the delay application and, if delay were condoned, consider the appeal on merits in accordance with law.
p. 6 · ¶ 905Holding
The writ petition was disposed of without directing the District Commissioner to decide the petitioner’s appeal, since he was not the competent First Appellate Authority.
p. 6 · ¶ 8The Court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh first appeal before the Director of Land Records and Surveys, Assam, accompanied by an application for condonation of delay.
p. 6 · ¶ 9The competent authority was directed to consider the sufficiency of the stated cause for delay and thereafter, subject to that decision, examine the appeal on merits in accordance with law.
p. 6 · ¶ 9No direction was issued for immediate delivery of the “Composite Land Sale Transfer” service, and there was no order as to costs.
p. 7 · ¶ 10Original Court PDF
Moin Sorowar JazbivsThe State Of Assam And 5 Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
