01Facts
The petitioner, a GST-registered consignee, challenged the detention of three containers carrying its goods at the Amingaon Railway Yard.
p. 3State tax officials were verifying 80 consignments amid suspicions of undervaluation, underweight declarations and tax evasion.
p. 3The authorities issued a show-cause notice dated 18.05.2023 to the transporter, Respondent No. 4, concerning alleged non-uploading of Part-B of the e-way bill, but did not issue a notice to the petitioner.
pp. 3–5The Court had stayed auction of the goods; the State did not file an affidavit-in-opposition but produced an instruction explaining the detention and notice to the transporter
pp. 3–502Issues
i.1. Whether the petitioner, as consignee of the detained goods, should be issued a show-cause notice and given an opportunity to produce documents concerning the alleged undervaluation, underweight declarations or tax evasion
pp. 4–6ii.2. Whether the show-cause proceedings concerning the detained goods should be decided under the applicable State and Integrated GST legislation and rules
pp. 6–703Law Applied
The Court referred to Section 129 of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, under which action concerning the detained goods was contemplated
p. 4the proceedings be decided in accordance with the AGST Act and its rules, read with the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and its rules
pp. 6–7a party who may provide relevant documents to address the allegations concerning detained goods must be given notice and an opportunity to respond
p. 6Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
ASSAM GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 Section 129
04Reasoning
The dispute concerned whether the goods were undervalued or underweight, or whether tax evasion had occurred.
pp. 5–6The authorities had issued a notice only to the transporter, whose representative admitted non-uploading of Part-B of the e-way bill; the petitioner had not been given an opportunity to produce documents addressing the allegations.
pp. 5–6Because the petitioner could assist in resolving the factual dispute, the Court considered that a notice to the petitioner was necessary before the matter could be decided
pp. 5–605Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Guwahati Zone, to issue the petitioner a fresh show-cause notice within 15 days, in terms of the notice issued to the transporter on 18.05.2023.
pp. 6–7The petitioner may reply with supporting documents, and the authority must decide the proceedings under the applicable AGST and IGST legislation and rules.
pp. 6–7If aggrieved by the decision, the petitioner may approach the appropriate forum
pp. 6–7Original Court PDF
M/S Rishi StonexvsThe State Of Assam And 5 Others
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
