01Facts
In pending proceedings in Crl. Misc. No. 409/2022, the wife sought interim maintenance of ₹20,000 per month for herself and ₹15,000 per month for the minor child.
pp. 2–3The Family Court awarded the child ₹12,000 per month from the date of the application and directed the father to pay ₹1,00,000 per annum towards educational expenses from 2022 until disposal of the proceedings, while rejecting the wife’s maintenance claim.
pp. 2–3The father challenged the monthly award under Article 227, contending that he had no current source of income and could not afford it; he did not dispute the educational-expense direction.
pp. 3–4The wife’s counsel stated that she earned approximately ₹20,000 per month and that the child’s transport costs alone were ₹80,000 per annum.
p. 4The High Court noted that no material supported the asserted transport costs and that the Family Court had not discussed the parties’ financial circumstances.
pp. 5–602Issues
i.1. Whether the Family Court’s award of ₹12,000 per month as interim maintenance for the child warranted modification in light of the parties’ financial circumstances and the father’s stated inability to pay.
pp. 3–6ii.2. Whether the direction to pay ₹1,00,000 per annum towards the child’s educational expenses should be disturbed.
pp. 4–603Law Applied
The petition invoked the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
p. 1The judgment identifies no specific statutory provision or precedent governing interim maintenance.
Its reasoning applies the principle that the interim amount should be assessed with regard to the child’s needs and the parties’ financial circumstances; the court also considered the evidentiary basis for claimed expenses.
pp. 5–604Reasoning
The Family Court had awarded maintenance without discussing the parties’ financial status, and the High Court found no supporting material for the claim that the child’s transportation cost ₹80,000 per annum.
p. 5The father accepted responsibility for the child and agreed to continue paying ₹1,00,000 per annum towards educational expenses, but maintained that his financial position did not permit payment of ₹12,000 per month.
pp. 3–4, 6Considering those circumstances, the High Court held that reducing the monthly interim maintenance to ₹7,000 would serve the purpose and make the order justifiable, while leaving the educational-expense direction intact.
p. 605Holding
The High Court partly modified the Family Court’s order.
pp. 6–7It directed the father to pay the child ₹7,000 per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing IA No. II until disposal of Crl. Misc. No. 409/2022, and affirmed the direction to pay ₹1,00,000 per annum towards educational expenses from 2022 until disposal.
pp. 6–7Arrears were ordered to be cleared within eight weeks.
pp. 6–7Original Court PDF
MR B T MOHANvsSMT SHOBHITA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
