Jammu and Kashmir High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceEmployment and Labour Law

J&K HC Rejects Dharmarth Trust’s Bid To Recall Ruling Upholding Chand Ram’s 50% Back-Wage Award, Says Appeal Was Available

DHARMARTH TRUST J AND Kv.INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR.

J&K HC Rejects Dharmarth Trust’s Bid To Recall Ruling Upholding Chand Ram’s 50% Back-Wage Award, Says Appeal Was Available. DHARMARTH TRUST J AND K vs INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR.. Jammu and Kashmir High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the judgment dismissing the Trust’s writ petition should be recalled because Chand Ram had allegedly died before judgment and his legal heirs were not brought on record

The court held

The Court held the recall application to be misconceived

It also directed

dismissed CM No. 3228/2026 without an order as to costs

01Facts

The Trust had challenged an Industrial Tribunal award granting Chand Ram 50% back wages from the date of his termination until the award

¶ 5

Chand Ram appeared in the writ proceedings through counsel but was later proceeded against ex parte; the Trust’s petition was dismissed and the Tribunal’s award upheld

¶ 6

The Trust then sought recall of that judgment, asserting that Chand Ram had died before it was delivered, that his legal heirs had not been brought on record, and that the judgment was affected by jurisdictional and procedural defects

¶ 1–2, 4

The Court noted that the Trust had not raised the death during the writ proceedings and had not pursued an appeal or review

¶ 6–8

02Issues

i.Whether the judgment dismissing the Trust’s writ petition should be recalled because Chand Ram had allegedly died before judgment and his legal heirs were not brought on record

¶ 1, 4, 6

ii.Whether the Trust could obtain recall on the grounds advanced, rather than pursuing an appeal or review

¶ 7–9

03Law Applied

The Court cited no statute or precedent. It stated that a party aggrieved by a judgment may challenge it by appeal, or seek review from the same court where an error apparent on the face of the record exists

¶ 7

The Court also observed that the Trust could have pursued an appeal against Chand Ram’s legal heirs if the judgment had been delivered after his death

¶ 8

Provisions in the judgment · 1

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 36

04Reasoning

The Court found that the Trust had not informed it of Chand Ram’s death at any point before the writ petition was decided, although it could have done so and sought substitution of his legal heirs

¶ 6

It considered recall an inappropriate means of challenging the judgment, particularly when appeal or review were available remedies

¶ 7–8

It also rejected the Trust’s assertion that the judgment had been reserved for several months, noting that it had been reserved on 4 December 2025 and delivered on 19 December 2025

¶ 3

05Holding

The Court held the recall application to be misconceived

¶ 9

dismissed CM No. 3228/2026 without an order as to costs

¶ 10
Jammu and Kashmir High Court

Original Court PDF

DHARMARTH TRUST J AND KvsINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR.

Jammu and Kashmir High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment