01Facts
The Trust had challenged an Industrial Tribunal award granting Chand Ram 50% back wages from the date of his termination until the award
¶ 5Chand Ram appeared in the writ proceedings through counsel but was later proceeded against ex parte; the Trust’s petition was dismissed and the Tribunal’s award upheld
¶ 6The Trust then sought recall of that judgment, asserting that Chand Ram had died before it was delivered, that his legal heirs had not been brought on record, and that the judgment was affected by jurisdictional and procedural defects
¶ 1–2, 4The Court noted that the Trust had not raised the death during the writ proceedings and had not pursued an appeal or review
¶ 6–802Issues
i.Whether the judgment dismissing the Trust’s writ petition should be recalled because Chand Ram had allegedly died before judgment and his legal heirs were not brought on record
¶ 1, 4, 6ii.Whether the Trust could obtain recall on the grounds advanced, rather than pursuing an appeal or review
¶ 7–903Law Applied
The Court cited no statute or precedent. It stated that a party aggrieved by a judgment may challenge it by appeal, or seek review from the same court where an error apparent on the face of the record exists
¶ 7The Court also observed that the Trust could have pursued an appeal against Chand Ram’s legal heirs if the judgment had been delivered after his death
¶ 8Provisions in the judgment · 1
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 36
04Reasoning
The Court found that the Trust had not informed it of Chand Ram’s death at any point before the writ petition was decided, although it could have done so and sought substitution of his legal heirs
¶ 6It considered recall an inappropriate means of challenging the judgment, particularly when appeal or review were available remedies
¶ 7–8It also rejected the Trust’s assertion that the judgment had been reserved for several months, noting that it had been reserved on 4 December 2025 and delivered on 19 December 2025
¶ 305Holding
The Court held the recall application to be misconceived
¶ 9dismissed CM No. 3228/2026 without an order as to costs
¶ 10Original Court PDF
DHARMARTH TRUST J AND KvsINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
