Chhattisgarh High CourtProperty and Real Estate LawAdministrative and Public Law

Kalma Barrage-Submerged Farmer’s Land: Chhattisgarh HC Orders Acquisition Proceedings And Compensation Within Six Months Of Certified Order Copy

SANTOSH PATELv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Kalma Barrage-Submerged Farmer’s Land: Chhattisgarh HC Orders Acquisition Proceedings And Compensation Within Six Months Of Certified Order Copy. SANTOSH PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner’s claim concerning land affected by the Kalma Barrage should be considered for acquisition and compensation.

The court held

The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the concerned authority to initiate appropriate acquisition proceedings and determine and disburse due compensation for the petitioner’s land within six months of receiving a certified copy of the order.

01Facts

The petitioner, an agriculturist, claimed ownership of several parcels of land at Village Timarlaga, Raigarh, which he alleged had come under submergence due to construction of the Kalma Barrage, preventing cultivation.

¶ 2

Although compensation had reportedly been awarded to similarly situated landowners, the petitioner had received none, despite making representations to the authorities.

¶ 2

He relied on an 11 August 2026 letter from the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, acknowledging that his land was affected by submergence.

¶ 3

The State did not oppose his request for consideration of compensation.

¶ 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner’s claim concerning land affected by the Kalma Barrage should be considered for acquisition and compensation.

¶ 3, 6

ii.2. Whether the authorities should be directed to determine and disburse compensation within a prescribed period.

¶ 1, 6

03Law Applied

The judgment identifies no specific statute, legal provision, or precedent as the basis for its decision.

It proceeds on the case-specific basis that, in light of the Water Resources Department’s communication acknowledging submergence and the State’s non-opposition, the competent authority should consider the petitioner’s claim, initiate appropriate acquisition proceedings, and determine and disburse compensation.

¶ 3–6

04Reasoning

The Court relied on the Executive Engineer’s letter confirming that the petitioner’s land had come under submergence and noted that the State did not oppose the requested relief.

¶ 3–5

On that record, it directed the competent authority, particularly the Collector, to consider the petitioner’s case, initiate appropriate acquisition proceedings, and determine and disburse compensation for the affected land.

¶ 6

05Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the concerned authority to initiate appropriate acquisition proceedings and determine and disburse due compensation for the petitioner’s land within six months of receiving a certified copy of the order.

¶ 6–7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SANTOSH PATELvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment