Calcutta High Court
Education LawAdministrative and Public Law

Transfer on special grounds remains subject to the basic eligibility conditions under Rule 3 of the 2015 Transfer Rules.

KORBAN ALI KHAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Calcutta High CourtJUDGMENT: September 22, 20264 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Transfer on special grounds remains subject to the basic eligibility conditions under Rule 3 of the 2015 Transfer Rules.. KORBAN ALI KHAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.. Calcutta High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, Headmaster of Rina S. B. Vidyatan, sought transfer to Arambagh High School on general/special grounds, citing his residence at Khanakul, medical ailments and difficulties at his existing school.

Source reference: para. 12; para. 18; p. 11

He applied for transfer on 4 September 2020 and his name appeared in the District Inspector of Schools’ list of applicants for transfer on special grounds dated 6 November 2020.

Source reference: para. 12; para. 18; p. 11

Respondent No. 13, then Headmaster of Sodepur High School, applied for transfer on 28 July 2020 and was subsequently recommended and transferred to Arambagh High School.

Source reference: paras. 19–21; pp. 11–13

Although he later claimed that the transfer was sought on account of his wife’s illness, his application sought transfer on administrative grounds, did not disclose material service particulars, and was not accompanied by medical documents.

Source reference: paras. 19–21; pp. 11–13

Respondent No. 13 had earlier obtained a general transfer to Sodepur High School on 20 July 2016.

Source reference: para. 22; pp. 13–14

Thus, when he applied for the impugned transfer in July 2020, he had neither completed five years of satisfactory service at Sodepur nor remained eligible for the benefit of general transfer more than once during his service.

Source reference: para. 22; pp. 13–14

The petitioner challenged the recommendation dated 15 February 2021 and the consequential order of transfer, seeking his own transfer to Arambagh High School.

Source reference: paras. 1–2; para. 15
02

Issues

Whether the transfer of Respondent No. 13 to Arambagh High School was valid under the West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015, despite his having previously availed general transfer and having served at Sodepur High School for less than five years?

Source reference: paras. 17, 21–22

Whether Respondent No. 13’s transfer could be sustained as a transfer on special medical grounds under Rule 4 of the 2015 Rules, when his application sought transfer on administrative grounds and was unsupported by medical documents or a medical enquiry?

Source reference: paras. 20–21

Whether the petitioner was entitled to consideration and appointment for transfer to Arambagh High School after the invalidation of Respondent No. 13’s transfer?

Source reference: paras. 16, 28–29
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015. Rule 3 requires confirmation in service and five years of satisfactory service in the particular school and post before seeking general transfer, while Rule 9 restricts the benefit of general/mutual transfer to once during the entire service period.

Source reference: para. 17; pp. 8–14

Rule 4 permits transfer on specified special grounds, including serious medical conditions of the teacher or specified family members, but the statutory conditions must be strictly satisfied and the authorities must apply their minds to the supporting materials.

Source reference: para. 17; pp. 9–11

Relying on Himani Parya v. State of West Bengal, the Court held that the basic eligibility requirements under Rule 3 apply even to transfers sought on special grounds.

Source reference: para. 23; pp. 14–16

Relying on The Headmaster, Bhotebari Sitanath High School v. Mapita Samaddar, and Managing Committee of Kamala Girls High School v. State of West Bengal, the Court held that special-ground transfer cannot be granted merely on unsupported assertions or political recommendations and that the competent authority must record a reasoned satisfaction based on contemporaneous materials.

Source reference: paras. 25, 27; pp. 16–22
04

Reasoning

The Court found that Respondent No. 13’s application did not establish any qualifying special medical ground.

Source reference: paras. 20–21

His contemporaneous application to the Minister-in-Charge sought transfer on administrative grounds and did not mention his wife’s illness or enclose medical records; nor was any medical enquiry conducted under Rule 4.

Source reference: paras. 20–21

The Court further held that Respondent No. 13 had already availed general transfer and had applied for the impugned transfer within five years of joining Sodepur, contrary to Rules 3 and 9.

Source reference: para. 22

His transfer therefore could not be treated as a valid special-ground transfer or a second permissible general transfer.

Source reference: para. 22

The fact that his name was absent from the District Inspector’s published list, while the petitioner’s name was included, further indicated that Respondent No. 13 had been recommended by bypassing the prescribed procedure.

Source reference: para. 26

Since the recommendation and consequential transfer order violated the governing Rules, the Court held them legally unsustainable.

Source reference: paras. 24, 28
05

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner’s challenge and set aside the recommendation dated 15 February 2021 and the consequential order transferring Respondent No. 13 to Arambagh High School, along with all consequential actions.

Respondent No. 13 was directed to be reverted to his earlier place of posting.

Source reference: para. 29

The West Bengal School Service Commission and the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education were directed to issue the necessary recommendation and appointment letters transferring the petitioner to Arambagh High School as Headmaster within ten days of communication of the judgment.

Source reference: para. 29

The writ petition was accordingly disposed of without costs, and the post-judgment prayer for stay was rejected.

Source reference: para. 30; Later Order, paras. 1–2
Calcutta High Court

Original Court PDF

KORBAN ALI KHANvsSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Calcutta High Court · September 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment