01Facts
The husband and wife married on 19 February 2017 and have a daughter.
pp. 4–8They had lived separately since 2019.
pp. 4–8The wife sought maintenance for herself and the child under Section 125 CrPC, alleging that the husband, an Assistant Professor pursuing a Ph.D., had substantial income and landed property.
pp. 4–8The husband disputed his income and claimed that the wife was employed and that he was then unemployed.
pp. 4–8The Family Court awarded monthly maintenance of ₹10,000 to the wife and ₹8,000 to the child from the date of the petition.
pp. 4–8The husband challenged the award to the wife; the wife sought enhancement for both claimants.
pp. 4–802Issues
i.Whether the Family Court’s award of ₹10,000 per month to the wife should be set aside or enhanced.
pp. 7–10ii.Whether the monthly maintenance awarded to the minor child should be enhanced.
pp. 10–1103Law Applied
The proceedings arose under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides a remedy for maintenance to a wife and child who cannot maintain themselves.
pp. 2–3The revisions were brought under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
pp. 2–3The Court applied the principle that a husband has a responsibility to maintain his wife and child and may assess his earning capacity from the circumstances, including his qualifications, where precise proof of income is unavailable.
pp. 10–11Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 125
04Reasoning
The wife could not establish the husband’s precise income or identify where he was working, but his Ph.D. qualification was undisputed.
pp. 10–11The Court considered the Family Court’s award of ₹10,000 per month to the wife reasonable and declined to enhance it.
pp. 10–11As to the child, it considered ₹8,000 per month inadequate and increased the amount to ₹15,000, without setting out a separate calculation of the child’s needs.
pp. 10–1105Holding
The husband’s revision was dismissed, and the wife’s revision was partly allowed.
p. 11The wife’s maintenance of ₹10,000 per month was confirmed; the child’s maintenance was enhanced from ₹8,000 to ₹15,000 per month, payable from the date of the petition until her marriage.
p. 11Original Court PDF
SRI MANOJ KUMAR S/O MOHANRAO HILALPUREvsSMT POOJA W/O MANOJKUMAR HILALPURE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
