Rajasthan High CourtConstitutional LawAdministrative and Public Law

Rajasthan HC Rejects Kota Showroom Employee’s Kerala Transfer Challenge, Says Receiving the Order in Kota Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction

MAHESH CHAND S/O SHRI MAN BAHADUR CHANDv.THE KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE COIR MARKETING FEDERATION LTD.

Rajasthan HC Rejects Kota Showroom Employee’s Kerala Transfer Challenge, Says Receiving the Order in Kota Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction. MAHESH CHAND S/O SHRI MAN BAHADUR CHAND vs THE KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE COIR MARKETING FEDERATION LTD.. Rajasthan High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether mere communication at Kota of the transfer order and show-cause notice issued in Kerala gives rise to part of the cause of action within the Rajasthan High Court’s territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2)?

The court held

The Rajasthan High Court held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

It also directed

It dismissed the writ petition, along with the stay application and any pending applications, while preserving the petitioner’s liberty to approach the appropriate forum where the cause of action arose wholly or in part.

01Facts

The respondent transferred the petitioner from its Kota showroom to its head office in Alappuzha, Kerala, by order dated 29 August 2025, and directed him to hand over charge and report there.

¶ 1–5

After the petitioner did not comply, the respondent issued a show-cause notice dated 6 October 2025.

¶ 1–5

The petitioner challenged both orders before the Rajasthan High Court, relying on their communication to him at Kota as part of the cause of action.

¶ 1–5

The Court directed the petitioner to address whether it had territorial jurisdiction.

¶ 1–5

02Issues

i.1. Whether mere communication at Kota of the transfer order and show-cause notice issued in Kerala gives rise to part of the cause of action within the Rajasthan High Court’s territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2)?

¶ 8–9, 14–16

ii.2. Whether the Rajasthan High Court could entertain the writ petition when the impugned orders were made in Kerala and no other part of the cause of action was shown to have arisen in Rajasthan?

¶ 13–16

03Law Applied

Article 226(2) of the Constitution permits a High Court to exercise writ jurisdiction where the cause of action arises wholly or in part within its territorial limits.

¶ 12.2, 12.4

Cause of action means the material facts that must be established to obtain relief; a fact must have a nexus to the dispute and cannot confer jurisdiction merely because it occurred within the forum’s territory (ONGC v. Utpal Kumar Basu; Union of India v. Adani Exports Ltd.).

¶ 12.2, 12.4

Mere service of a notice in the forum is insufficient unless that service is an integral part of the cause of action (State of Rajasthan v. Swaika Properties).

¶ 12.1

The Court distinguished Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India, relied on by the petitioner, as inapplicable to the circumstances of this case.

¶ 5, 14

Provisions in the judgment · 1

the Act (alias, unresolved) Section 52

04Reasoning

The transfer order and show-cause notice were issued by the respondent at its head office in Alappuzha, Kerala.

¶ 13–16

The petitioner’s reliance on receipt of those documents at Kota did not establish a material fact connected to the underlying dispute that arose in Rajasthan.

¶ 13–16

Applying the principle that communication alone does not create a cause of action, the Court held that no part of the cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction.

¶ 13–16

05Holding

The Rajasthan High Court held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

¶ 16–18

It dismissed the writ petition, along with the stay application and any pending applications, while preserving the petitioner’s liberty to approach the appropriate forum where the cause of action arose wholly or in part.

¶ 16–18
Rajasthan High Court

Original Court PDF

MAHESH CHAND S/O SHRI MAN BAHADUR CHANDvsTHE KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE COIR MARKETING FEDERATION LTD.

Rajasthan High Court · November 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment