HCMONTHLY CASE LAW ARCHIVE
Read 10 LawLens analyses of Sikkim High Court judgments published in August 2026, covering key rulings, legal principles and case law.
← BACK TO SIKKIM COURT REPORTPERMANENT MONTHLY EDITIONS
The appellant-husband and respondent-wife married according to Hindu customary rites on 25 November 2019 at Kirateshwar Shivalaya Mandir, Legship, Gyalshing, Sikkim, and had a daughter who was five years old at the ti...
3 MIN READ→
The State appealed under Section 378(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the acquittal of Pratiksha Rai and Aita Raj Rai, who had been tried under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...
4 MIN READ→
The revisionist filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”), alleging that the respondents had committed offences under Sections 420, 468, 409, 471 read with Section 12...
3 MIN READ→
Cipla Limited, operating a pharmaceutical unit in Sikkim, claimed budgetary support under the GST-era budgetary support scheme applicable to specified States, including Sikkim.
3 MIN READ→
The applicant, accused no. 3, was prosecuted under Section 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), and Sections 111 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), concerning...
4 MIN READ→
The deceased, Toran Suresh Punamiya, travelled to Sikkim with her husband, Suresh Punamiya, and their two minor children.
3 MIN READ→
The petitioners instituted a writ petition challenging the levy and related statutory and executive measures concerning GST on betting, gambling, online gaming and allied transactions.
4 MIN READ→
The petitioners filed a writ petition raising five substantive challenges concerning the levy and valuation of GST on betting, gambling and online gaming transactions.
3 MIN READ→
Respondent nos. 1–3, the heirs of late Sonam Sherpa, instituted a motor accident claim arising from an accident on 13.01.2024 involving a vehicle owned by respondent no. 4, Karma Tamang.
3 MIN READ→
The petitioners invoked Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) seeking quashing of FIR No. Singtam 137/2024 and the consequential charge-sheet.
3 MIN READ→