Advocates cannot be prosecuted for forgery or atrocities solely for representing clients and seeking evidence.
The petitioner, an advocate, was arrayed as Accused No. 4 in Crime No. 94/2024
2 MIN READ→
KHCMONTHLY CASE LAW ARCHIVE
Read 14 LawLens analyses of Karnataka High Court judgments published in May 2026, covering key rulings, legal principles and case law.
← BACK TO THE KARNATAKA LAW DESKPERMANENT MONTHLY EDITIONS
The petitioner, an advocate, was arrayed as Accused No. 4 in Crime No. 94/2024
2 MIN READ→
The Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 (husband and wife) had a domestic dispute on October 20, 2025, during which the Petitioner, in an inebriated state, allegedly assaulted the Respondent.
2 MIN READ→
The Petitioner, claiming to be a tenant of a commercial property since 2001, challenged the measures taken by the Respondent-Bank under Sections 13 and 14 of the SARFAESI Act following a default by the landlord (borro...
3 MIN READ→
The petitioner, a Nigerian national residing in Bengaluru on an expired business visa
3 MIN READ→
The Petitioner, a Superintendent Engineer in the PWD, and his wife, a Child Development Project Officer, are both public servants
3 MIN READ→
The Appellant (Plaintiff) filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding a property she purchased via a registered sale deed dated 19.04.2003 from her mother, Zahrunnissa
3 MIN READ→
The Malnad Technical Education Society (R) is a registered society governed by the Karnataka Societies Registration (KSR) Act, 1960.
3 MIN READ→
The petitioners comprise an unregistered partnership firm, M/S Spectrum Space Infra, and its partners. The firm was originally constituted on June 10, 2020, and underwent subsequent reconstitutions and name changes in...
2 MIN READ→
The Respondents (Existing Partners) and the Appellant (Incoming Partner) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 13.02.2015 to induct the Appellant into the partnership firm, M/s. JBS Nursing Home
2 MIN READ→
The Respondent was allotted Site No. 973 in Sir M. Vishwesharaiah Layout, Bengaluru, but the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) failed to execute the Sale Deed.
2 MIN READ→
The Petitioner (decree-holder) obtained a decree for specific performance in OS No. 138/2018 on 06.04.2021.
2 MIN READ→
The Appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction regarding Survey No. 141 (6 acres 1 gunta) in Kullur Village, claiming it was Halabaki Inam land granted to their ancestors fo...
2 MIN READ→
Respondent No. 1 (SSL), a generating company, sold surplus power through inter-State open access after its PPA with the appellants ended in 2009
3 MIN READ→
The petitioner, mother of the detenue (Abhicyrill @ Abhi), challenged a detention order dated 11.12.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Kolar, under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers,...
2 MIN READ→