HCMONTHLY CASE LAW ARCHIVE

High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Judgments in June 2026: Case Law Digest

Read 35 LawLens analyses of High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh judgments published in June 2026, covering key rulings, legal principles and case law.

← BACK TO J&K AND LADAKH COURT REPORT

PERMANENT MONTHLY EDITIONS

Browse by month

AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED

June 2026 Judgments

35 ARTICLES · NEWEST FIRST
### Revenue Entries Cannot Solely Determine Title in Reference Disputes Under National Highways Act Summary: The High Court held that while the Collector must rely on revenue records for administrative assessment, mutation entries do not conclusively prove title. However, a reference under Section 3H of the National Highways Act is reserved for recognized "persons interested." Since the appellants failed to establish a prima facie interest during acquisition and their predecessor-in-interest long acquiesced to the existing revenue entries, the Collector was not obligated to withhold compensation or refer the matter to a Civil Court. Nonetheless, to protect the appellants' pending civil claims, the court ordered that disbursement of compensation to the recorded owner be subject to a bank guarantee.. ATIQA BEGUM AND OTHERS vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (REVENUE). Jammu and Kashmir High Court. LawLens

Jammu and Kashmir High Court·

### Revenue Entries Cannot Solely Determine Title in Reference Disputes Under National Highways Act Summary: The High Court held that while the Collector must rely on revenue records for administrative assessment, mutation entries do not conclusively prove title. However, a reference under Section 3H of the National Highways Act is reserved for recognized "persons interested." Since the appellants failed to establish a prima facie interest during acquisition and their predecessor-in-interest long acquiesced to the existing revenue entries, the Collector was not obligated to withhold compensation or refer the matter to a Civil Court. Nonetheless, to protect the appellants' pending civil claims, the court ordered that disbursement of compensation to the recorded owner be subject to a bank guarantee.

Following Ganie’s death, the entire estate (40 Kanals, 17 Marlas) was mutated in favor of Respondent No. 5 in 1954 (Mutation No. 1066) on the grounds of her being a Khananeshin daughter and an alleged Will

2 MIN READ