BHCMONTHLY CASE LAW ARCHIVE
Read 8 LawLens analyses of Bombay High Court judgments published in October 2026, covering key rulings, legal principles and case law.
← BACK TO THE BOMBAY LAW DESKPERMANENT MONTHLY EDITIONS
Respondent No. 1, a teacher who had served the school for over 18 years and was Headmaster, challenged the acceptance of his resignation, alleging that it had been obtained under force and that the Management refused...
2 MIN READ→
The Appellant was arrested on 9 October 2007 in connection with a prosecution arising from the recovery of arms, ammunition and explosives.
2 MIN READ→
MIDC issued a show-cause notice under Section 4(2) of the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955, alleging unauthorised subletting and failure to execute a lease deed after transfer of the premises.
2 MIN READ→
The petitioner filed a public interest petition under Article 226 seeking to set aside development permissions granted to Respondent Nos. 3–7 for redevelopment projects in Navi Mumbai.
3 MIN READ→
The Petitioner was appointed to a sanctioned post in a fully aided school in 1990, became permanent in 1991, and was admitted to the pension scheme and allotted a General Provident Fund account in 1993. She later join...
2 MIN READ→
The petitioner Trusts claimed ownership of land at Paspoli, Mumbai, relying on historic conveyances and revenue records.
3 MIN READ→
The petitioner bank, which was under liquidation, approached the Trial Court under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, seeking possession of secured assets.
2 MIN READ→
The Applicant Trust had executed individual Agreements for Sale with flat purchasers in the respondent housing societies.
3 MIN READ→