LRTHE NATIONAL MONTHLY LEDGER

Indian Court Judgments in August 2026: LawLens Monthly Reporter

Explore 545 LawLens reports on Indian court judgments published in August 2026, with case summaries, legal issues and key holdings.

← BACK TO LAWLENS REPORTER

PERMANENT MONTHLY EDITIONS

Browse by month

AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED

August 2026 Judgments

545 ARTICLES · NEWEST FIRST
Annulled pattas require eviction and restoration of possession under Section 49(3); Calcutta High Court says contempt tribunal can enforce it without sending parties to civil court. NISHI KANTA BHAUMIK AND ORS. vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.. Calcutta High Court. LawLens

Calcutta High Court·

Property and Real Estate LawAdministrative and Public Law

Annulled pattas require eviction and restoration of possession under Section 49(3); Calcutta High Court says contempt tribunal can enforce it without sending parties to civil court

The petitioners’ predecessor-in-interest purchased approximately 8.18 acres of land at Mouza Haripur, Namkhana, South 24 Parganas, through registered conveyances, obtained mutation, and paid revenue in respect of the...

4 MIN READ

Gujarat HC quashes GST cancellation order after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated judgments, mandates verification and warns violations may invite contempt. FAIZ ENTERPRISE THROUGH PROPRIETOR MAHETAR MAHIR FARUKBHAI vs STATE TAX OFFICER, UNIT-67, SURAT. Gujarat High Court. LawLens

Gujarat High Court·

Administrative and Public LawTechnology, Cybercrime, and Data Privacy

Gujarat HC quashes GST cancellation order after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated judgments, mandates verification and warns violations may invite contempt

The petitioner challenged the show-cause notice dated 30 October 2025, the GST registration-cancellation order dated 15 December 2025, the order rejecting the revocation application dated 10 March 2026 and issued on 2...

3 MIN READ

Kerala High Court: DRT cannot reject unnumbered SARFAESI applications on maintainability or locus grounds at the preliminary stage; issues require adjudication after hearing parties. FATHIMA M.P, vs THE IDBI BANK LTD,. Kerala High Court. LawLens

Kerala High Court·

Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Kerala High Court: DRT cannot reject unnumbered SARFAESI applications on maintainability or locus grounds at the preliminary stage; issues require adjudication after hearing parties

The petitioner challenged coercive measures initiated by respondents 1 and 2 under the SARFAESI Act concerning the alleged secured asset. She filed a Securitisation Application under Section 17 before the DRT-I, Ernak...

3 MIN READ

After repeated defiance of its orders, Allahabad High Court deems deceased work-charge employee regularised and orders consideration of his son’s compassionate appointment claim. Hasan Ahmad vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others. Allahabad High Court. LawLens

Allahabad High Court·

Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

After repeated defiance of its orders, Allahabad High Court deems deceased work-charge employee regularised and orders consideration of his son’s compassionate appointment claim

The petitioner’s father, Rifakat Hussain, was engaged as a Junior Assistant in the Work Charge Establishment of the Rural Engineering Department on 01 November 1985 and served for over 18 years until his death on 11 A...

5 MIN READ

Rajasthan High Court dismisses pleas against notices to border-area mosques, madrasas and dargahs; directs committees with BSF representatives to assess action on security grounds. MADARSA EHLE SUNNAT FAIZE GOSUL HAQUE SAKHAR NOOH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Rajasthan High Court. LawLens

Rajasthan High Court·

Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Rajasthan High Court dismisses pleas against notices to border-area mosques, madrasas and dargahs; directs committees with BSF representatives to assess action on security grounds

The judgment concerned a batch of writ petitions challenging eviction, vacation and show-cause notices issued to persons and institutions managing Dargahs, Masjids, Madrasas and other structures situated within approx...

4 MIN READ

Bombay High Court holds injunction breaches under Order XXXIX Rule 2A are judged on a high civil standard, not beyond reasonable doubt; directs Khadi body to pay ₹2.5 lakh costs. Khadi And Village Industries Commission vs Shri Jaishukh N. Bhuta. Bombay High Court. LawLens

Bombay High Court·

Civil Procedure and EvidenceIntellectual Property Law

Bombay High Court holds injunction breaches under Order XXXIX Rule 2A are judged on a high civil standard, not beyond reasonable doubt; directs Khadi body to pay ₹2.5 lakh costs

The Khadi & Village Industries Commission (“KVIC”) obtained an interim injunction dated 14 December 2022 restraining the Mumbai Khadi & Village Industries Association (“MKVIA”), its representatives and persons acting...

5 MIN READ